11:0411:04, 13 June 2024diffhist+62
Fort Johnson
Had to delve way too long into article to find out who original name related to. Putting it into final intro para hopefully helpsTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
8 June 2024
05:4405:44, 8 June 2024diffhist+7
Alex Jones
I found the original word order in this sentence made it quite difficult to interpret. I think this new wording makes it more quickly digestedTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
15 May 2024
08:4508:45, 15 May 2024diffhist−4,610
Depp v. Heard
→Podcast: Far too much excessive detail for a single piece of media about the trial. Risk of previous length was it started to read like established fact rather than the podcast’s allegations. Hopefully condensed appropriatelyTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
22:2122:21, 23 July 2023diffhist+47
Kiri Allan
Tidied up section, clarified infringement for drink driving (not charge), took out reference to mental health as reason for resignationTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
22:1322:13, 20 June 2023diffhist+34
Ain't I a Woman?
No reliable source for certainty of extemporaneity (Truth never confirmed as much), so re worded to make it less decisiveTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
03:2003:20, 11 June 2023diffhist+87
Ben Shapiro
→Race: Due to the lack of interest in my post on the Talk page following revisions of my edit, I have changed this section back to my original wording. I do not believe the way I have phrased it is in any way controversialTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
02:5802:58, 11 June 2023diffhist+51
Political views of J. K. Rowling
→Transgender rights: I think this wording better reflects the source material. “Disputed” implies that this was in fact what Rowing was saying; I don’t know that it is uncontroversial that Rowling was conflating the two, that her article makes that clear that she was, that Rowling would agree with that interpretation. In those circumstances, I think making it clear that this was Mermaids’ interpretation of what she said and adding direct quotes makes this more consistent with WP:NPOVTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
21:3421:34, 2 June 2023diffhist+87
Ben Shapiro
→Race: Careful rewording of this section- I think we need to be careful of not taking expert evidence given at trial as Wikipedia gospel, although I agree the apparent invalidity of Shapiro’s views on this point needs to be highlighted. Hopefully this edit cuts the right balanceTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
07:5307:53, 28 May 2023diffhist+58
George W. Bush
Added career prior to holding public office into top lede section, consistent with Obama’s wiki ledeTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit