19 August 2005

• 08:41 08:41, 19 August 2005 diff hist +1,163‎ Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency ‎No edit summary

18 August 2005

• 14:56 14:56, 18 August 2005 diff hist +356‎ Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency ‎No edit summary
• 14:55 14:55, 18 August 2005 diff hist −356‎ Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency ‎No edit summary
• 14:54 14:54, 18 August 2005 diff hist 0‎ Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency ‎No edit summary
• 14:52 14:52, 18 August 2005 diff hist +74‎ Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency ‎No edit summary
• 14:51 14:51, 18 August 2005 diff hist +356‎ Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency ‎No edit summary
• 14:06 14:06, 18 August 2005 diff hist +26‎ m May 30 ‎ 'm restoring this - the pro-English nature of the tribunal is attested in English government records - it's frankly better documented than her execution itself.
• 14:00 14:00, 18 August 2005 diff hist +522‎ Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedians for Decency ‎ →‎August 18

23 May 2005

• 02:17 02:17, 23 May 2005 diff hist +7‎ m Gilles de Rais ‎ Unfortunately, Wikipedia lists Jean V of Brittany as the "VI". Most historians consider him the 5th, but this change would require extensive renaming of articles.
• 02:11 02:11, 23 May 2005 diff hist +366‎ m Gilles de Rais ‎ Cleaning up this section and balancing the POV

22 May 2005

• 02:07 02:07, 22 May 2005 diff hist +26‎ m May 30 ‎ I'm restoring this - the pro-English nature of the tribunal is attested in English government records - it's frankly better documented than her execution. If one is "POV", then so is the other.

4 May 2005

• 03:16 03:16, 4 May 2005 diff hist +11‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ This has nothing to do with glottal-stops. Kindly provide a date for this family tree, just as all the others have a date provided.

3 May 2005

• 03:23 03:23, 3 May 2005 diff hist +15‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ Please get a book on medieval French and see that apostrophes were not used, as I said before. There is no need for further argument on such a basic point.

2 May 2005

• 02:51 02:51, 2 May 2005 diff hist +15‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ The apostrophe alone proves that it was later than the 15th century. Cite a date for it, in conformance with the other examples given.

1 May 2005

• 02:56 02:56, 1 May 2005 diff hist −1‎ m Jacques d'Arc ‎ When a name ends in an "s", the possessive is formed by adding just an apostrophe, rather than an " 's ".
• 02:55 02:55, 1 May 2005 diff hist −5‎ m Joan of Arc ‎No edit summary

29 April 2005

• 02:51 02:51, 29 April 2005 diff hist −114‎ m Jacques d'Arc ‎No edit summary
• 02:47 02:47, 29 April 2005 diff hist +709‎ m Talk:Joan of Arc ‎No edit summary

19 April 2005

• 02:08 02:08, 19 April 2005 diff hist +78‎ m Joan of Arc ‎No edit summary

18 April 2005

• 03:00 03:00, 18 April 2005 diff hist +19‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ The intro remains a mess....
• 02:56 02:56, 18 April 2005 diff hist +69‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ As you requested, I've cited 15th century manuscript sources. If you really want to add "de Arc", then you'll have to likewise cite a source.

17 April 2005

• 03:16 03:16, 17 April 2005 diff hist −221‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ If you're not willing to accept any compromise, let's just mention the modern form and leave it at that.

16 April 2005

• 03:26 03:26, 16 April 2005 diff hist +76‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ Here's a version which will hopefully address your views without implying that it was actually written "de Arc" in the 15th century. Otherwise, let's just eliminate this footnote.

15 April 2005

• 02:59 02:59, 15 April 2005 diff hist +65‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ All of the forms I listed are found in 15th century manuscripts. As a compromise, I've added another sentence for other forms.

14 April 2005

• 03:22 03:22, 14 April 2005 diff hist +376‎ m Talk:List of occultists ‎ →‎Problems with article
• 03:19 03:19, 14 April 2005 diff hist +16‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ This footnote had always presented 15th century spellings; the new addition merely makes it clearer (in response to your own comments) and is not "frivolous". Please just leave it be.

13 April 2005

• 03:24 03:24, 13 April 2005 diff hist +12‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ Amended, although the footnote's final sentence had always made it clear that it was referring to 15th century spellings of her name.
• 03:22 03:22, 13 April 2005 diff hist +326‎ m Talk:List of occultists ‎ →‎Problems with article

12 April 2005

• 03:19 03:19, 12 April 2005 diff hist +1,029‎ Talk:List of occultists ‎ →‎Problems with article

11 April 2005

• 02:55 02:55, 11 April 2005 diff hist −289‎ m List of occultists ‎ Please don't undo everything which had been worked out a few months ago. Reverting to previous version, and hoping that this can be allowed to rest again.
• 02:52 02:52, 11 April 2005 diff hist −8‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ None of the examples you gave were from the 15th century.

10 April 2005

• 02:44 02:44, 10 April 2005 diff hist −8‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ There wasn't any source of any kind from the 15th century which used the form "de Arc", and no such source has been cited.

9 April 2005

• 02:53 02:53, 9 April 2005 diff hist −8‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ The form "de Arc" was not used in the 15th century manuscripts.

8 April 2005

• 02:50 02:50, 8 April 2005 diff hist +433‎ m Talk:Joan of Arc ‎No edit summary

7 April 2005

• 02:57 02:57, 7 April 2005 diff hist +477‎ m Talk:Joan of Arc ‎No edit summary

6 April 2005

• 02:46 02:46, 6 April 2005 diff hist +27‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ →‎Notes: Minor corrections. Please let this compromise version remain rather than bickering over every single word.
• 02:42 02:42, 6 April 2005 diff hist +59‎ m Talk:Joan of Arc ‎ →‎Names: 15th Century or Modern
• 02:42 02:42, 6 April 2005 diff hist +1,174‎ m Talk:Joan of Arc ‎ →‎Names: 15th Century or Modern

5 April 2005

• 03:00 03:00, 5 April 2005 diff hist +153‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ See comments on talk page.
• 02:58 02:58, 5 April 2005 diff hist +894‎ m Talk:Joan of Arc ‎ →‎Names: 15th Century or Modern

4 April 2005

• 02:44 02:44, 4 April 2005 diff hist +687‎ m User talk:Noisy ‎No edit summary
• 02:41 02:41, 4 April 2005 diff hist +158‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ There was no standard form given by Joan or anyone else, nor could there have been: spelling in the 15th century was phonetic rather than standardized.

3 April 2005

• 03:51 03:51, 3 April 2005 diff hist +57‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ An apostrophe was _not_ used to indicate a glottal stop in 15th century French. The form "D'Arc" is a very recent attempt at compromise, and does not date to the 15th century.

2 April 2005

• 03:53 03:53, 2 April 2005 diff hist −212‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ Revert erroneous information - "d'Arc" (with an apostrophe) is not a 15th century spelling found in her birth records, and in fact no apostrophe was ever used in 15th century contracted forms.

1 April 2005

• 03:28 03:28, 1 April 2005 diff hist −23‎ m Joan of Arc ‎No edit summary

31 March 2005

• 04:46 04:46, 31 March 2005 diff hist +1,319‎ m Talk:Joan of Arc ‎ Restoring -- Criticisms of ungrammatical edits are not "personal attacks", and you are not allowed to delete other people's posts merely because they criticized - that's considered vandalism.

30 March 2005

• 03:49 03:49, 30 March 2005 diff hist −169‎ m Joan of Arc ‎No edit summary
• 03:46 03:46, 30 March 2005 diff hist +381‎ m Talk:Joan of Arc ‎No edit summary

27 March 2005

• 03:31 03:31, 27 March 2005 diff hist +89‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ The phrase: "declared her innocent in 1456 from a postwar appeal" is ungrammatical (improper use of "from"). Rewording and adding extra historical detail.
• 03:29 03:29, 27 March 2005 diff hist +22‎ m Joan of Arc ‎ Clarifying and breaking it up into two sentences, each with its own main topic, in order to respond to your objections.