01:5301:53, 3 March 2016diffhist−16
m
We Can Do It!
No conflict of interest. Improving wording is not "deciding the matter." rvs can stand, but removed again "paternalistic, controlling" as subjective and unnecessarily politicized language.which detracts from articleTag: Visual edit
2 March 2016
18:1818:18, 2 March 2016diffhist+1,574
Geraldine Doyle
Shedding light on the genesis of the erroneous identification of the press photo and the error's propagation in the media. Drawing obvious conclusion of disproof of connection to We Can Do it.Tag: Visual edit
07:2307:23, 1 March 2016diffhist+1,133
Geraldine Doyle
Important evidence that the photo Doyle claimed was of her is actually of a California worker named Parker, therefore Doyle cannot be the inspiration for poster.Tag: Visual edit
17:1617:16, 28 February 2016diffhist+15
We Can Do It!
New wording, taken from your comment, is more accurate. Actually only one writer, [20]Coleman casts (very credible) doubt on widely accepted connection. Original source of connection not currently available to cite directly but may contain arguable proof.Tag: Visual edit
08:1908:19, 28 February 2016diffhist+1,549
We Can Do It!
References cited in the removed sentence do not discuss the photograph, nor its resemblance or lack of to the poster. Removed for subjectivity, lack of citation.Tag: Visual edit
07:4907:49, 28 February 2016diffhist+505
We Can Do It!
Reference to Doyle in rediscovery section moved to wire-service photo section. Photo is of Naomi Parker. "No evidence exists" statement needs citation and was removed.Tag: Visual edit
06:2606:26, 28 February 2016diffhist+3,679
We Can Do It!
Edited to include compelling new evidence regarding probable mis-identification of the model for the photograph thought to be the inspiration for this poster.Tag: Visual edit