1 May 2012

• 00:46 00:46, 1 May 2012 diff hist +256‎ Submarine communications cable ‎ correcting claim to first substantial sea distance traversed, copyedit
• 00:36 00:36, 1 May 2012 diff hist +1,580‎ Submarine communications cable ‎ theoretical round trip time London-NYC should be under 40ms if land routes were not so difficult to clear, it's actually just under 60ms, suggesting 50% > optimal for switching + all-sea routing

28 April 2012

• 22:13 22:13, 28 April 2012 diff hist +1,206‎ User talk:Tmol42 ‎ /* Talk page protocol response
• 22:03 22:03, 28 April 2012 diff hist +1,352‎ Talk:Human capital ‎ If you close the merge discussion, then the missing comment you have deleted is basically irrelevant and can be archived with the others. If not, please restore it.
• 17:17 17:17, 28 April 2012 diff hist +1,409‎ User talk:Tmol42 ‎ leave it up to you to decide if two years is enough time for the merge proposal or if more comment on that should be solicited
• 17:11 17:11, 28 April 2012 diff hist +17‎ Talk:Human capital ‎ →‎Comment protocol: merge arguments belong together: Tmol42 link to user page restored, sorry for error
• 17:10 17:10, 28 April 2012 diff hist +83‎ Talk:Human capital ‎ →‎Comment protocol: merge arguments belong together: because if they spread around, you can't count them
• 17:09 17:09, 28 April 2012 diff hist +752‎ Talk:Human capital ‎ →‎Comment protocol: merge arguments belong together: - also dealt with objections at talk:individual capital, hopefully talk protocol problems are solved?
• 17:03 17:03, 28 April 2012 diff hist +97‎ Talk:Individual capital ‎ →‎Signalling issue: A summary of another individual capital issue for eventual inclusion in the article. Thanks User:Rjanag who raised this at talk:human capital
• 17:02 17:02, 28 April 2012 diff hist +5,419‎ Talk:Individual capital ‎ there's no "obvious reason" to delete relevant references - rewriting somewhat to avoid the impression that the commenters commented on this particular page, making it a summary that thanks the authors from talk:human capital
• 16:55 16:55, 28 April 2012 diff hist +190‎ Talk:Human capital ‎ your revert removed good live links to the references others had provided, which is far more damaging than any of the edits you object to. Please take more care with references.
• 16:54 16:54, 28 April 2012 diff hist +7,222‎ Talk:Human capital ‎ The only changes to other editors' texts were harmless copyedits - now removed, and the rest restored, along with the merge comment that belongs on this page not at talk:individual capital
• 16:46 16:46, 28 April 2012 diff hist +2,585‎ Human capital ‎ putting human capital flight up front with a less shallow account of how human capital came to be a term of art - more links to closely related articles with different perspectivs
• 16:02 16:02, 28 April 2012 diff hist −1,185‎ Talk:Human capital ‎ →‎individual capital merger: removing double pasted text
• 16:01 16:01, 28 April 2012 diff hist +2,795‎ Talk:Human capital ‎ moving in the (against) merge argument from talk:individual capital, which now has the references cited against the merge (which need to be worked into that article). Three informed votes against merge, one seemingly uninformed vote against?
• 15:56 15:56, 28 April 2012 diff hist +5,573‎ Talk:Individual capital ‎ moving in some summarized debates & references from talk:human capital, moving out some merge arguments (to that same page)
• 15:49 15:49, 28 April 2012 diff hist +4,606‎ Talk:Human capital ‎ against the merge, the only vote "for" it seems to not even know what the title is, and the only problem with it, dearth of references, has been solved already by contributions on this talk page (now adding to article)
• 15:24 15:24, 28 April 2012 diff hist +1,347‎ Individual capital ‎ not the same as "intellectual capital" because there are economically "valuable" individuals without much (or any) "intellectual" capacity or contribution
• 15:17 15:17, 28 April 2012 diff hist +793‎ Individual capital ‎ correcting introduction, individual capital is not a synonym for human capital, because the latter includes social and instructional (cultural) elements, not just talent

23 April 2012

• 19:02 19:02, 23 April 2012 diff hist +224‎ Talk:Consensus decision-making ‎ →‎Political correctness: This could be dealt with by way of intimidation and the "illusion of unanimity" or groupthink issues
• 19:00 19:00, 23 April 2012 diff hist +115‎ Talk:Consensus decision-making ‎ →‎Something was left out in the HISTORICAL EXAMPLES: needs citation
• 18:58 18:58, 23 April 2012 diff hist +110‎ Consensus decision-making ‎ →‎Non-verbal techniques: ''For more detail on these methods and their use in specific processes see the section Hand Signals below.''
• 17:01 17:01, 23 April 2012 diff hist +1,119‎ Consensus decision-making ‎ →‎Historical examples: expanding on protestant pacifist methods, references and views
• 16:50 16:50, 23 April 2012 diff hist −23‎ Consensus decision-making ‎ →‎Consensus is not unanimity: copyedit to put reference links after authors names, views or quotes
• 16:47 16:47, 23 April 2012 diff hist +1,326‎ Consensus decision-making ‎ formal studies of Supreme Court unanimity cited
• 16:32 16:32, 23 April 2012 diff hist +742‎ Consensus decision-making ‎ →‎Consensus is not unanimity: better expanded with links to names of authorities
• 16:27 16:27, 23 April 2012 diff hist +82‎ Consensus decision-making ‎ →‎Consensus is not unanimity: link fix
• 16:26 16:26, 23 April 2012 diff hist +2,234‎ Consensus decision-making ‎ Pagels' historical view
• 16:09 16:09, 23 April 2012 diff hist +437‎ Consensus decision-making ‎ →‎Consensus decision-making with consensus blocking: clarifying when the minority is asked to document its position
• 16:04 16:04, 23 April 2012 diff hist +4,304‎ Consensus decision-making ‎ →‎Agreement vs. consent: removing bias that "unanimity" is desirable or a goal, citing study of it as groupthink, actual practitioner references from Otesha, Occupy and Starhawk

22 April 2012

• 18:53 18:53, 22 April 2012 diff hist +1,938‎ SETI@home ‎ "threats" -> "challenges", mention of data center vs. cloud computing emissions issue (though no definitive study exists of SETI@home in particular, it's obviously subject to the same criticism as other clouds are)

19 April 2012

• 19:15 19:15, 19 April 2012 diff hist +296‎ Gulliver's Travels ‎ →‎Sequels and imitations: another sequel
• 16:27 16:27, 19 April 2012 diff hist +114‎ Gulliver's Travels ‎ →‎Cultural influences: The corporate brand name of Yahoo! is apparently based explicitly on Swift's low assessment of human nature.

18 April 2012

• 03:55 03:55, 18 April 2012 diff hist +194‎ Lucha libre ‎ It also appears in other pop culture such as mainstream advertising: In Canada Telus' Koodo Mobile prepaid cell service uses a cartoon lucha libre wrestler as its spokesperson/mascot.