10 October 2019

• 03:13 03:13, 10 October 2019 diff hist −1‎ Taxi Driver ‎ →‎Symbolism: Parenthetical comment is apt as a separate sentence.
• 03:11 03:11, 10 October 2019 diff hist +14‎ Taxi Driver ‎ →‎Symbolism: split two-subject sentence (encyclopedic style instead of magazine-article style)

9 October 2019

• 06:15 06:15, 9 October 2019 diff hist +8‎ John Hinckley Jr. ‎ Split two-subject sentence.
• 06:08 06:08, 9 October 2019 diff hist −12‎ Larry Speakes ‎ →‎Presidential spokesman: "recent" is ambiguous, specified "2017" from the date of the earliest source.
• 05:24 05:24, 9 October 2019 diff hist −264‎ Proton Mail ‎ Removed "alexa rank" as unnotable, irrelevant. No secondary source to establish notability, source was only primary. It also lends undue credibility and importance to Alexa, and is promotional of it. It's not like A is the only such mouthpiece. Including it here in such a way unduly suggests some kind of partnership between WP and A, or a reliance of WP on A.
• 05:08 05:08, 9 October 2019 diff hist +5‎ James Brady ‎ →‎Death: tense fix

8 October 2019

• 18:52 18:52, 8 October 2019 diff hist −82‎ Ariane (rocket family) ‎ →‎External links: same
• 18:51 18:51, 8 October 2019 diff hist −1,828‎ Ariane (rocket family) ‎ →‎Models: Off-topic. Promotional of model makers. Tag: section blanking
• 18:49 18:49, 8 October 2019 diff hist −115‎ Ariane (rocket family) ‎ →‎External links: External link seems unrelated, and broken.
• 04:45 04:45, 8 October 2019 diff hist +1‎ SpiderOak ‎ (null edit) I take back my rash remark about disguising and not explaining -- my too-quick reading of the edit summary. It does call for removal however, because it appears as if it's purposeful as a testimonial promotion. If it's worked-over to change that appearance it can be replaced (in the main text).
• 04:26 04:26, 8 October 2019 diff hist +13‎ SpiderOak ‎ Replaced unimportant part of the "partial revert" ("in" --> "and as early as")
• 04:24 04:24, 8 October 2019 diff hist −218‎ SpiderOak ‎ Undid revision 920005959 by HaeB ( talk) Undid unexplained revert of removal of testimonial promotion. If you have a reason for replacing the testimonial, then explain it. Don't disguise it behind an explanation of a trivium. Better yet, rewrite it so it looks less like a promotion, more pertinent, and more notable. It would also need to be in the main text because lede material is a summary of main material, not a place for new material. Tag: Undo
• 03:48 03:48, 8 October 2019 diff hist −131‎ ReFS ‎ Removed speculation, opinion, divination. Not a summary of material in main text (where it could have had a source).
• 03:45 03:45, 8 October 2019 diff hist −2,170‎ ReFS ‎ Removed large straight-out copy of source, it's not a notable quote. Possible copyright violation. We're supposed to be *paraphrasing* secondary sources, not copying them in huge chunks.
• 03:38 03:38, 8 October 2019 diff hist −121‎ ReFS ‎ →‎Stability and known problems: Uncited WP:OR.
• 03:36 03:36, 8 October 2019 diff hist −92‎ ReFS ‎ →‎Stability and known problems: WP is not a how-to or advice giver ( WP:NOTHOWTO)

6 October 2019

• 07:24 07:24, 6 October 2019 diff hist +315‎ SpiderOak ‎ Fixed ref name that I broke. (Doh!)
• 07:18 07:18, 6 October 2019 diff hist −40‎ SpiderOak ‎ →‎Main features: "Layered approach" is vague, meaningless, not used in source. (Source is also primary, the SO website itself, but that's another issue)
• 07:04 07:04, 6 October 2019 diff hist −520‎ SpiderOak ‎ A testimonial promotion? Promotional. Not a summary of material in main text. Reinstatement would need to place it in the main text with conveyance of a more solid notability, less appearance as a promotion.
• 06:58 06:58, 6 October 2019 diff hist −2‎ SpiderOak ‎ their --> its, ("company" is singular)
• 06:57 06:57, 6 October 2019 diff hist −13‎ SpiderOak ‎ What? You want a medal? ("early" is subjective, promotional)
• 06:55 06:55, 6 October 2019 diff hist +1‎ SpiderOak ‎ "distinguishes" --> "differentiates" : (less promotional tone)
• 04:37 04:37, 6 October 2019 diff hist +5‎ Talk:Proton Mail ‎ →‎Truly "end to end"? Pervasive puffery and self sourcing.
• 04:35 04:35, 6 October 2019 diff hist −2‎ Talk:Proton Mail ‎ →‎Truly "end to end"? Pervasive puffery and self sourcing.
• 03:57 03:57, 6 October 2019 diff hist −94‎ Client-side encryption ‎ Toned down unsupported gushing. It's only as reliable as the client. For example, if the client can be "updated" (potentially into an insecure state), then it's only fake security.
• 03:49 03:49, 6 October 2019 diff hist +1,310‎ Talk:Proton Mail ‎ →‎Truly "end to end"? Pervasive puffery and self sourcing.
• 01:45 01:45, 6 October 2019 diff hist +1,406‎ Talk:Proton Mail ‎ →‎Truly "end to end"? Pervasive puffery and self sourcing.: new section
• 01:10 01:10, 6 October 2019 diff hist +13‎ Talk:Proton Mail ‎ →‎Promotional tone related edits
• 00:52 00:52, 6 October 2019 diff hist +7‎ Proton Mail ‎ I tried and succeeded in replacing the MOS edit. Also, I began a spot on the talk page for discussion of the four edits there if you like (as we should)..
• 00:42 00:42, 6 October 2019 diff hist +28‎ Talk:Proton Mail ‎ →‎Promotional tone related edits
• 00:41 00:41, 6 October 2019 diff hist +587‎ Talk:Proton Mail ‎ →‎Promotional tone related edits: new section
• 00:26 00:26, 6 October 2019 diff hist +1‎ Proton Mail ‎ Undid revision 919815814 by 98.216.246.87 ( talk) Whoops. I couldn't replace it fully so I'm undoing my attempt. Was that edit put there on purpose to make an undo difficult? I wonder about that. Anyway, sorry I couldn't redo the MOS edit, you'll have to do it again if you really want it. Tag: Undo
• 00:21 00:21, 6 October 2019 diff hist −1‎ Proton Mail ‎ Replaced valid edit caught up in revert
• 00:19 00:19, 6 October 2019 diff hist −1,609‎ Proton Mail ‎ Still unexplained. Vague reference to "due course" suggests intent to fix refs *someday*, but it doesn't satisfy WP:burden to refrain from reinstatement unless reliable refs can be supplied *at the time of* reinstatement. BUT EVEN SO, that doesn't address the other problems such as promotional tone. Same old unexplained vague generalized mass revert. Explain yourself buddy, or you look like just another reactionary IP reverter. Tag: references removed
• 00:10 00:10, 6 October 2019 diff hist −1,101‎ BBC Radio 1 ‎ Undid revision 919429299 by Plizdontshoot ( talk) True, inability to use broken-frickin-links isn't evidence of redundancy (whatever that means here), but it *would* make them dubious, and non-notable. :-) Are they actually broken? I haven't checked, but two previous (opposing) editors seemed to think they are, so I'm going with that. Tag: Undo

5 October 2019

• 23:32 23:32, 5 October 2019 diff hist +15‎ Talk:Proton Mail ‎ →‎Account Types - or Price List
• 23:30 23:30, 5 October 2019 diff hist +171‎ Talk:Proton Mail ‎ →‎Account Types - or Price List
• 23:28 23:28, 5 October 2019 diff hist −1,602‎ Proton Mail ‎ Undid revision 919630428 by Davey2010 ( talk) Undid unexplained non-specific revert of large number of edits. Appears to have been a generalized beef rather than well thought out valid issues -- but can't tell for sure because there was no explanation. Need to explain reverts for credibility, also don't forget to include *reliable* refs where WP:burden applies. Tags: Undo references removed
• 04:09 04:09, 5 October 2019 diff hist −298‎ TrueCrypt ‎ →‎E4M and SecurStar dispute: Removed innuendo (unencyclopedic). Tag: references removed

4 October 2019

• 19:10 19:10, 4 October 2019 diff hist −1,244‎ Proton Mail ‎ →‎Account types: Unnotable. Self-Sourced. Tag: section blanking
• 19:09 19:09, 4 October 2019 diff hist +87‎ Proton Mail ‎ Added "promotional" tag.
• 18:53 18:53, 4 October 2019 diff hist −35‎ Proton Mail ‎ →‎Development: I was "forced" to reduce "overwhelming" promotional melodramatic tone.
• 18:47 18:47, 4 October 2019 diff hist −410‎ Proton Mail ‎ →‎Development: Promotional in tone and nature. Also dubious notability. Source was the company's own blog. Tag: references removed
• 07:36 07:36, 4 October 2019 diff hist +9‎ Forward secrecy ‎ An "exploit" is something different than the bug. An exploit *takes advantage of* a bug.

3 October 2019

• 17:27 17:27, 3 October 2019 diff hist −19‎ FreeBSD jail ‎ Cute functionality, but off topic digression (how many years ago a particular date is).

2 October 2019

• 06:26 06:26, 2 October 2019 diff hist +32‎ Ephemeral port ‎ A server doesn't necessarily have to be listening/operating on its "well-known" port. I *think* I corrected it correctly with my apprentice-level understanding, but please fix it if I misunderstand.

1 October 2019

• 18:13 18:13, 1 October 2019 diff hist +4‎ Uranian (sexuality) ‎ →‎Taxonomy of Uranismus: "Assigned" is loaded yes, which is unencyclopedic, but also not actually necessary. It's also ambiguous here. Clarified ambiguity and un-loaded the tone with the straightforward "physically".
• 17:51 17:51, 1 October 2019 diff hist −198‎ The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (film) ‎ Uncited. Not summarized from material in main text. Main text says something along those lines only about a proposed reboot, not about this film. Can be reinstated if it's mentioned (for real) in the main text with a citation there as well.
• 17:42 17:42, 1 October 2019 diff hist +2‎ The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (film) ‎ Split long sentence, corrected tense.
• 06:50 06:50, 1 October 2019 diff hist −5‎ Judy Garland ‎ →‎Adult stardom: "Although" incorrectly implied that an ended-affair would be expected to not be on good terms. Restated without tat implication..