04:5504:55, 22 June 2020diffhist+14
Lawrence v. Texas
edit name of case in text- the correct caption is Lawrence et al. v. State of Texas. NOT Lawrence v. Texas. et al. indicates there were multiple plaintiffs.
01:0401:04, 19 June 2020diffhist−25
Dost test
→Case law: insert citation needed tag for Brabson v. Florida - Case cannot be located on Florida State Supreme Court Website, lending towards serious issues of credibility of the reference materials on the direct point.
23:5923:59, 10 June 2020diffhist+262
Watermelon stereotype
insert citation needed tag. Language of the source indicates the figures were only for 1994-1996, which is not sufficient enough to confirm or deny the truthfulness of the matter asserted, which could be true for some years but not for other years.
20:5920:59, 28 May 2020diffhist−90
Paintball
→United States: remove citation needed tag, and rephrase content to be directly supported by reference. A single government reference source supports the entire paragraph at this time.Tag: references removed
03:5403:54, 24 May 2020diffhist+145
Probable cause
→Cyber surveillance: current references indicate that the patriot act within the scope indicated here is expired. The text was updated to past tense and the assertion that the patriot act has expired was added with appropriate reference and relying on the internal article for the U.S. Patriot Act..
03:2503:25, 24 May 2020diffhist+28
Probable cause
→Probationers and parolees: added explicit mention of the name of a case- when discussing the contents of a case, it is appropriate to name the case in the event that the reader does not check the reference citation for purposes of clarity.