01:0901:09, 21 March 2020diffhist0
Wikipedia:New page patrol source guide
Moved Skwawkbox to 'No consensus'. Publication is regulated by only PRP-recognised press regulator, with full transparency and independent complaints process. Not right to have it in unreliable.
21:5821:58, 29 December 2019diffhist+405
The Skwawkbox
Undid revision 933041336 by
Nedrutland (
talk). It is not contrary to judge's conclusions. It is part of judge's conclusions on a separate issue to that of dishonesty. This constant war on including a fact is looking increasingly political..Tag: Undo
15:2215:22, 29 December 2019diffhist+99
The Skwawkbox
Added in remainder of quote that 'The Irish Question' thought was necessary for proper representation - even though it was already perfectly representative of his criticism, which was the point. Now someone will delete it because it's 'too long' again....Tag: Visual edit
22:3722:37, 22 December 2019diffhist+1,382
The Skwawkbox
Undid revision 931851918 by
Nedrutland (
talk). Is Wikipedia supposed to be accurate, or politically convenient? Given the judgment in Turley's favour, his criticisms of her and her legal team are even more noteworthy.Tag: Undo
19:5419:54, 16 October 2019diffhist+1,778
Luciana Berger
Undid revision 921593569 by
Gaitskell's Ghost (
talk). Facts are directly relevant and objectively verifiable. Bias accusation is not relevant to fact of June report and the attacks on it by a reporter who later reported exactly the same.Tag: Undo