22:3922:39, 20 October 2021diffhist+15
Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors
added 'among others', as it seems like the tour was not just in "the UK, Portugal, Italy and Switzerland" but in a bunch of other countries like Turkey, Poland, Austria, Greece etc. based on their trailer description here https://vimeo.com/20045770
16:1716:17, 20 October 2021diffhist+3,831
Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors
Bringing back additional reviews, again simply removing reviews because "the section is way over bloated" is an unfair statement. I understand if you would summarize into one sentence a couple of reviews that noted similar things in the film (without removing the link to the review), but flat out removal of nearly all reivews is unproductive.
16:1116:11, 20 October 2021diffhist+1,087
Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors
Bringing back additional reviews - simply removing reviews because "the section is way over bloated" is an unfair statement. I understand if you would summarize couple of reviews that noted similar things in the film (without removing the link to the review), but flat out removal of nearly all reivews is unproductive. Also it is important to state 'when XYZ review was written', because Moskowitz in 1965 is more valuable than a review from Patterson in 2008, because it was 'written upon release'
15:2615:26, 20 October 2021diffhist+1,980
Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors
How can Ukrainian film critics give 'mixed reviews' if we only provide two examples of negative reviews? If we only provide two examples of negative reviews, then we are essentially saying that the film 'was met with negative reivews', which is untrue and the two examples of 'postive' reviews illustrate that perfectly; hence, bringing back the two examples of positive reviews (i.e., S. Zinych and N. Kapel'horods'ka's review as well as Ivan Drach's review
15:2215:22, 20 October 2021diffhist+97
Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors
It is acceptible not to have sources for just mere 'screening' at the film festvals (especially since those are already sourced in the 'Festival release' section), but all awards should have sources, otherwise anyone could come and just add random 'awards'
15:1915:19, 20 October 2021diffhist+720
Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors
Without the "fully restored audio and image" of the 2015 'restored' version (which is what sources explicitly state), it is hard to understand what's difference between 2011 'restored' version and 2015 'restored version'
15:1415:14, 20 October 2021diffhist+2,019
Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors
Brining back the paragraph about the "2011 'restored' version". The fact that in 2011 a 'restored' version was created is important (especially because later in 2015 another 'restored' version was created)
15:1215:12, 20 October 2021diffhist+444
Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors
The statement that the film"had enjoyed a limited commerical sucess" is important because "6.5 million admissions" was actually not that great of a box office - there were films that had 20+ million admissions at the box office
15:1015:10, 20 October 2021diffhist+7,980
Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors
Bringing backe deleted section about 'Festival release' - the section about festival releases is written neutrally and only mentions the most important festival premiers (it does not list all festival premiers)