23:3923:39, 21 February 2018diffhist+449
PokerStars
There is NOTHING IN THE REFERENCE that supports the claim. you are clearly paid by pokerstars for your editing
23:3823:38, 21 February 2018diffhist−60
Lanterne rouge
a series of alternatives is incredibly ugly to read. we do not do this: the consensus embodied in the manual of style is that no variety of English is preferred, only consistency within each article.
19:0619:06, 21 February 2018diffhist+639
PokerStars
→History: nothing unencyclopaedic about this. User:2005 is on a years-long campaign to promote the subject of the article and whitewash criticism, presumably as they are employed by them
21:1621:16, 20 February 2018diffhist−64
Severoonezhsk
for readers not familiar with the classification of Russian settlements, offering them a choice of what one is is not in any way helpful.