17:0417:04, 5 June 2010diffhist+1,159
Caroline Glick
Undid revision 366218889--It is indeed vandalism. Scrupulously in line with BLP standards. Incidentally, reference clearly states author of allegation in Article from Slate.com to be Alex Pareene.
16:1816:18, 5 June 2010diffhist+1,499
Caroline Glick
Undid revision 366206434---Again, Sagi Nahor and others are invited to dispute the allegations of racism. But refs conclusively demonstrate their existence, simply deleting them is vandalism.
16:1516:15, 5 June 2010diffhist+1
Caroline Glick
Undid revision 366206614--Sagi Nahor has misinterpreted documentation of allegations of racism for allegations themselves. Refs need prove only that allegations exist, not their veracity.