05:0605:06, 7 October 2009diffhist+1,011
Byron York
you're probably right that it shouldn't be a section of its own, but it's a notable controversy and there is nothing remotely POV in the two-sentence description of it.
04:3604:36, 7 October 2009diffhist+1,027
Byron York
restore controversy section, which was removed with only namecalling nonsense for a reason - fix biased language of reporting
21:5721:57, 5 October 2009diffhist−109
Ex-gay movement
the group's website doesn't say it's non-religious, and it DOES say that it was founded by ministers - and the rest of the sentence wasn't supported AT ALL by the citationTag: references removed