Special:contributions 2a02:587:410d:a56a:f4ad:ec8d:72ac:4146

This IP address is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

05:28, 28 November 2021 Graham87 talk contribs blocked 2a02:587:4100::/43 talk with an expiration time of 3 years (anon. only, account creation blocked) (oops, redo block: this is a different range ... purely disruptive forum posting/weirdness/speculation; extend block)

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

13:10 13:10, 26 August 2021 diff hist +56‎ Physicalism ‎ →‎Realistic physicalism
13:07 13:07, 26 August 2021 diff hist +1‎ Physicalism ‎ n
13:06 13:06, 26 August 2021 diff hist +638‎ Physicalism ‎ Galen Strawson doesn't take into account procedurality, cause and effect relationship and the fact that ontological states (how things are) are not affected by human knowledge or interpretation...
12:54 12:54, 26 August 2021 diff hist +15‎ Hempel's dilemma ‎ most of physics is not ontological / ontological efforts [Robert W. Spekkens] do exist, and are mathematical. They are not useless. They try to represent ontology within physics, and it's not some useless trick because physics still has open questions (it always will, because the hypernymic = wider group of its fundamental constituents is nondefinable...) but that doesn't mean that nature is magical = uncausal // Hempel erroneously claims that physicalism = causal procedurality is physics
12:48 12:48, 26 August 2021 diff hist −1‎ Hempel's dilemma ‎ →‎Overview
12:47 12:47, 26 August 2021 diff hist +1‎ Hempel's dilemma ‎ some fields of study like the foundations of mathematics and quantum foundations provide the deep causality of these fields; ontologically the same is required, an ontological foundation to reality, see: Robert W. Spekkens but also the University of Oxford has texts on the subject. Antiphysicalists are unproceduralists and open to the violation of cause and effect; magic and non-definitions / without ontological (here not merely theoretical) foundations nothing physical would exist
12:43 12:43, 26 August 2021 diff hist +245‎ Hempel's dilemma ‎ in physicalism 'natural' means procedural, causally coherent or all effect have particular causes regardless of human knowledge and interpretation and it also means 'ontological reality' and not just an hypothesis or a calculational technique / if unprocedural things exist or we are open to that possibility like Hempel, these things have no ontological self-definition, thus: 1. they cannot have a specific identity; arbitrarily/uncausally will mutate into other things and vanish,2.unfoundational

This is the contributions page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.

26 August 2021