This IP address is currently blocked.
The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:
05:28, 28 November 2021Graham87talkcontribs blocked
2a02:587:4100::/43talk with an expiration time of 3 years (anon. only, account creation blocked) (oops, redo block: this is a different range ... purely disruptive forum posting/weirdness/speculation; extend block)
21:5121:51, 15 September 2021diffhist+1,337
Talk:Hubble volume
2a02:587:4108:b95d:8524:10af:732:7f90 (
talk)
Hypernyms of causality: # interlocked in the same wider Everettian spacetime # wider hypernym of causality: non-interlocked in the same wider Everettian spacetime, but existing on a spacetime with the same physics Are there hypernyms of causality? Yes. Are there important in order we understand cosmogony in physics? Yes.Tag: Reverted
14:5814:58, 14 September 2021diffhist+1,918
Talk:Free will
2a02:587:4109:9cf5:80e5:3161:e876:dc91 (
talk)
• Personhood and selfhood do not pre-exist the natural phenomena which cause them (personhood and selfhood are the results of natural processes and do not pre-exist uncausally/unprocedurally/supernaturally/magically/ontologically nondefined).Tag: Reverted
14:3614:36, 14 September 2021diffhist+1,295
Talk:Free will
2a02:587:4105:fdf2:29d3:600f:2942:e957 (
talk)
• Probabilistic phenomena are not caused by the individual. • Physical phenomena which occur inside human bodies are not caused by different laws controlled by each different body. • Personhood and selfhood do not pre-exist the natural phenomena which cause them (personhood and selfhood are the results of natural processes and do not pre-exist).Tag: Reverted
13 September 2021
09:1409:14, 13 September 2021diffhist0
Religion in Finland
2a02:587:4105:fdf2:dddd:c93a:9f6d:90b9 (
talk)
Unaffiliated is a falsely huge group. Separate the atheists, agnostics and irreligious. (Conscious atheists are "religiously unaffiliated" THAT REVEALS THAT RELIGION IS NOT THE ULTIMATE HYPERNYM OF "METAPHYSICAL WORLDVIEW". Conscious atheists are not metaphysically unaffiliated. Simply Wikipedia is BIASED and worldview-racist and falsely claims that "religion" is the hierarchically highest possible hypernym of any "
metaphysical worldview". IF THE TITLE IS BIASED, BIAS EXPANDS!!!Tag: Reverted
10:5610:56, 30 August 2021diffhist0
Religion in Russia
2a02:587:410a:5907:f0e8:6585:5b0f:8167 (
talk)
All humans are equals. Order is presented by population size. Only if two sizes are the same, we put first the oldest religion in the country. (Vagues/others are mentioned last, because they are not a coherent group with a specific and conscious identity.)Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
00:2000:20, 27 August 2021diffhist+758
Talk:Physicalism
2a02:587:410d:a56a:39f2:3b49:9c8b:c68e (
talk)
Descriptions are different ontological states from what they describe.''' A description would have to be processed by at least a computer or a brain in order to be an ontological state, otherwise inactive inside o book or other file it's a potential ontological state.
00:0600:06, 27 August 2021diffhist+2,080
Talk:Physicalism
2a02:587:410d:a56a:39f2:3b49:9c8b:c68e (
talk)
Physicalism is by no means tautological to physicsism. Physicalism is not physicsism. According to some (not all) physicalists, we will never be able to have the final physical theory, because the components of it are linked to an infinite series of causally related systems, and the overall hypernymous spacetime system isn't theoretically definable (for practical reasons, because we don't have infinite time and infinite archives to keep the data and the calculations going) but these physicalists
12:5412:54, 26 August 2021diffhist+15
Hempel's dilemma
2a02:587:410d:a56a:f4ad:ec8d:72ac:4146 (
talk)
most of physics is not ontological / ontological efforts [Robert W. Spekkens] do exist, and are mathematical. They are not useless. They try to represent ontology within physics, and it's not some useless trick because physics still has open questions (it always will, because the hypernymic = wider group of its fundamental constituents is nondefinable...) but that doesn't mean that nature is magical = uncausal // Hempel erroneously claims that physicalism = causal procedurality is physics
12:4712:47, 26 August 2021diffhist+1
Hempel's dilemma
2a02:587:410d:a56a:f4ad:ec8d:72ac:4146 (
talk)
some fields of study like the foundations of mathematics and quantum foundations provide the deep causality of these fields; ontologically the same is required, an ontological foundation to reality, see: Robert W. Spekkens but also the University of Oxford has texts on the subject. Antiphysicalists are unproceduralists and open to the violation of cause and effect; magic and non-definitions / without ontological (here not merely theoretical) foundations nothing physical would exist
12:4312:43, 26 August 2021diffhist+245
Hempel's dilemma
2a02:587:410d:a56a:f4ad:ec8d:72ac:4146 (
talk)
in physicalism 'natural' means procedural, causally coherent or all effect have particular causes regardless of human knowledge and interpretation and it also means 'ontological reality' and not just an hypothesis or a calculational technique / if unprocedural things exist or we are open to that possibility like Hempel, these things have no ontological self-definition, thus: 1. they cannot have a specific identity; arbitrarily/uncausally will mutate into other things and vanish,2.unfoundational
03:4203:42, 25 August 2021diffhist+394
Talk:Agnosticism/GA2
2a02:587:410c:dee6:4d2e:eb31:ea8e:69 (
talk)
Agnostics being open to [the possibility of] the supernatural, reject the necessity of a rigorous ontology of foundational interactions // they are OPEN to foundational interactions, but agnostics REJECT THE NECESSITY of it [of the foundational interactions]
03:3703:37, 25 August 2021diffhist+1,879
Talk:Physicalism
2a02:587:410c:dee6:4d2e:eb31:ea8e:69 (
talk)
Human knowledge or interpretation does not define the cosmos. The agnostics reject the necessity of a rigorous ontology of foundational interactions. Ontology is not tautological to human theory, and that is not trivial. see: Perimeter Institute but also University of Oxford
23 August 2021
14:5814:58, 23 August 2021diffhist−1
Talk:Physiocracy
2a02:587:410c:dee6:90d6:d39f:c47d:cf79 (
talk)
SYRIZA party: they control the Nicos Poulantzas Institute, and STRICTLY reject physicalist lectures (either philosophical or scientific: struogony vs personal cosmogony, neuroscience vs soul theory, chemical abiogenesis versus magical and uncausal creation of life from a self-evident bearer of precosmic personhood... and personhood is supposedly self-evident (theists reject Mary Anne Warren's criteria of personhood because she doesn't include: self-evidence ex precosmic nihilo and cosmogony)