27 December 2017

• 04:02 04:02, 27 December 2017 diff hist +789‎ Talk:Political correctness ‎ →‎This might sound strange: new section

15 September 2017

• 07:44 07:44, 15 September 2017 diff hist +452‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ /* Pickavage quote *

13 September 2017

• 03:57 03:57, 13 September 2017 diff hist +296‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎"introduced by far-right online media in 2016"
• 03:53 03:53, 13 September 2017 diff hist +360‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎"introduced by far-right online media in 2016"
• 03:49 03:49, 13 September 2017 diff hist −53‎ Alt-left ‎No edit summary

12 September 2017

• 23:52 23:52, 12 September 2017 diff hist +33‎ Alt-left ‎ Acyually there was consensus - this was extensively discussed in Talk
• 23:51 23:51, 12 September 2017 diff hist +212‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎"introduced by far-right online media in 2016"

27 August 2017

• 23:56 23:56, 27 August 2017 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Political correctness ‎ →‎Changing lede from negative to positive
• 23:55 23:55, 27 August 2017 diff hist 0‎ Talk:Political correctness ‎ →‎Changing lede from negative to positive
• 23:55 23:55, 27 August 2017 diff hist +568‎ Talk:Political correctness ‎ →‎Changing lede from negative to positive: new section
• 10:41 10:41, 27 August 2017 diff hist −15‎ Alt-left ‎ Undid revision 797436827 by BrendonTheWizard unsourced

25 August 2017

• 08:07 08:07, 25 August 2017 diff hist +220‎ Talk:Political correctness ‎ →‎Modern Pc Controversies

20 August 2017

• 19:22 19:22, 20 August 2017 diff hist +119‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎"Scholars have noted...": new section
• 19:20 19:20, 20 August 2017 diff hist +311‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎"Severely criticized": new section
• 19:18 19:18, 20 August 2017 diff hist −9‎ Alt-left ‎ AgainOR, SYNTH, POV and completely unsupported. Is anyone actually looking g at this article? There are major problems here
• 19:16 19:16, 20 August 2017 diff hist −80‎ Alt-left ‎ This sentence is OR, SYNTH and unsupported by sources. Consensus was to remove it. NO WHERE do any of the cited sources say this. Please read them.
• 19:14 19:14, 20 August 2017 diff hist +16‎ Alt-left ‎ →‎Background: where is "scholars" coming from? I have all three cited sources and don't see it used. I thought consensus was to remove this sentence entirely

19 August 2017

• 06:38 06:38, 19 August 2017 diff hist −4‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎Usage
• 06:38 06:38, 19 August 2017 diff hist +688‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎Usage
• 05:48 05:48, 19 August 2017 diff hist +611‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎Current disputes/issues
• 05:46 05:46, 19 August 2017 diff hist +22‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎Usage
• 05:45 05:45, 19 August 2017 diff hist +1,009‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎Usage

18 August 2017

• 05:36 05:36, 18 August 2017 diff hist +552‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎A framework for progress on the article
• 05:30 05:30, 18 August 2017 diff hist +125‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎many scholars

16 August 2017

• 07:08 07:08, 16 August 2017 diff hist +143‎ User talk:Knowledgekid87 ‎ →‎Thare was a dead link I switched it: new section
• 07:05 07:05, 16 August 2017 diff hist +114‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎FYI
• 07:02 07:02, 16 August 2017 diff hist −94‎ Talk:Alt-left ‎ →‎FYI
• 06:45 06:45, 16 August 2017 diff hist −10‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alt-left ‎ →‎Alt-left: ce
• 06:42 06:42, 16 August 2017 diff hist +505‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alt-left ‎ →‎Alt-left

23 July 2017

• 08:04 08:04, 23 July 2017 diff hist +110‎ User talk:Amortias ‎ →‎A suggestion for you: new section
• 07:33 07:33, 23 July 2017 diff hist +1‎ User talk:Cassianto/Archive 10 ‎ Looks like someone made a grammatical errror when apologizing to you. I've taken the liberty to fix it.

29 June 2017

• 01:44 01:44, 29 June 2017 diff hist +24‎ Gallagher (comedian) ‎ →‎Comedy style: Switched wording Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit

3 June 2017

• 08:14 08:14, 3 June 2017 diff hist +1,459‎ Talk:Political correctness ‎ →‎Here are the current "see-also" categories: new section
• 07:59 07:59, 3 June 2017 diff hist +104‎ Political correctness ‎ Undid revision 783575421 by Pincrete ( talk). Pincrete - PLEASE discuss this in talk first - you've literally reverted every edit I've made that to this page

30 November 2016

• 04:06 04:06, 30 November 2016 diff hist +16‎ Talk:Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight) ‎ →‎Naming the other party in article
• 04:04 04:04, 30 November 2016 diff hist +4‎ Talk:Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight) ‎ →‎Naming the other party in article

24 November 2016

• 03:41 03:41, 24 November 2016 diff hist +1,363‎ User talk:Koncorde ‎ →‎Recent Edits: new section
• 03:30 03:30, 24 November 2016 diff hist +457‎ Rolling Stone ‎ →‎UVA rape story: clarifying Washington Post perspective.
• 03:23 03:23, 24 November 2016 diff hist +59‎ Rolling Stone ‎ Adding police perspective.

23 November 2016

• 04:14 04:14, 23 November 2016 diff hist +518‎ Talk:Controversial Reddit communities ‎ →‎SRS
• 04:09 04:09, 23 November 2016 diff hist +2,039‎ Controversial Reddit communities ‎ Undid revision 750497751 by 23.242.67.118 ( talk) Additional sources found please see talk

20 November 2016

• 22:50 22:50, 20 November 2016 diff hist +21‎ A Voice for Men ‎ →‎Criticism
• 20:17 20:17, 20 November 2016 diff hist +1,483‎ Talk:Controversial Reddit communities ‎ →‎SRS
• 03:12 03:12, 20 November 2016 diff hist +572‎ Talk:Controversial Reddit communities ‎ →‎SRS
• 03:06 03:06, 20 November 2016 diff hist −1,869‎ Controversial Reddit communities ‎ Undid revision 750493648 by 23.242.67.118 ( talk) Tag: section blanking
• 03:03 03:03, 20 November 2016 diff hist +445‎ Talk:Controversial Reddit communities ‎ →‎SRS
• 02:59 02:59, 20 November 2016 diff hist +294‎ Talk:Controversial Reddit communities ‎ →‎SRS
• 02:52 02:52, 20 November 2016 diff hist +500‎ Talk:Controversial Reddit communities ‎ →‎SRS
• 02:41 02:41, 20 November 2016 diff hist +31‎ Talk:Controversial Reddit communities ‎ →‎SRS
• 02:39 02:39, 20 November 2016 diff hist +119‎ Talk:Controversial Reddit communities ‎ →‎SRS