13:1713:17, 25 February 2021diffhist+744
Qatar Media Corporation
Undid revision 1008792562 by
Elspamo4 (
talk): Part revd the edit as addition of a mere single source doesn't do anything. Moreover, it appears you couldn't revert the entirety of vandalism here — and that's why, it appears you were in rather bizzare-hurry to salvage this article about a discrete=non-notable subject. While I understand Wikipedia's oh-so-surprisingly startling-revelations on
WP:WORLDVIEW as a non-stereotypical 'fIrSt...Tag: Reverted
05:0605:06, 25 February 2021diffhist−655
China Global Television Network
FIXED: Alright.. Given it's asked to open a talk-page bargaining merely for tagging, it would be far more productive if as a compromise: The claim that RWB has classified this as a "misinformation" and not US-based sources, without "
Amigao" bothering to address USAGM's reliability for reporting on mainland-Chinese State, I changed the prose on top of prior improvements that arguably the only-reliable citation here, NYT's coverage for the same is conveyed in
WP:WIKIVOICE, 🚫AGMTags: references removedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit