23:5223:52, 21 July 2015diffhist−34
Big O notation
links from lead section to the rest of the article are redundant. we assume that readers are intelligent enough to find the rest of the article without assistance.
23:4823:48, 21 July 2015diffhist0
Big O notation
yes, the reference is to the paper. its contents, not the fact that it exists. please be less bone-headed in your interventions.
00:0400:04, 21 July 2015diffhist−1,859
Helium-3
logical ordering for lead, and trimmed it to a reasonable size. also rm unnecessary double explanation and random unnecessary bolding
23:0923:09, 20 July 2015diffhist−224
Davis Cup
→Ties and rubbers: explain things once, and assume that the reader is intelligent enough to understand your explanation. if you think they are so stupid they need constant reminders, you're aiming at the wrong audience