24 September 2022

• 13:05 13:05, 24 September 2022 diff hist +11‎ Anal beads ‎ →‎See also Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

21 September 2022

• 01:55 01:55, 21 September 2022 diff hist −3‎ Bored Ape ‎ tweak Tag: Reverted
• 01:55 01:55, 21 September 2022 diff hist +89‎ Bored Ape ‎ expand Tag: Reverted

14 June 2022

• 01:18 01:18, 14 June 2022 diff hist +909‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section: Reply Tag: Reply
• 00:39 00:39, 14 June 2022 diff hist +690‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ retort
• 00:34 00:34, 14 June 2022 diff hist +265‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ clarify
• 00:26 00:26, 14 June 2022 diff hist +612‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ reply

13 June 2022

• 14:31 14:31, 13 June 2022 diff hist +55‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section
• 14:30 14:30, 13 June 2022 diff hist +493‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section: reply
• 13:15 13:15, 13 June 2022 diff hist +13‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section: minor c/e
• 13:14 13:14, 13 June 2022 diff hist +761‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ Getting this discussion back on topic of the proposed changes
• 12:22 12:22, 13 June 2022 diff hist +448‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Coming to an actual consensus for the "Reactions" section: reply
• 12:19 12:19, 13 June 2022 diff hist +179‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: edit: i see a new section has been created to discuss this with links , so perhaps best to discuss this there
• 12:04 12:04, 13 June 2022 diff hist +146‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ reply
• 12:03 12:03, 13 June 2022 diff hist +370‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ reply
• 12:00 12:00, 13 June 2022 diff hist +31‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus
• 11:59 11:59, 13 June 2022 diff hist +479‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: reply
• 11:31 11:31, 13 June 2022 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: fix pings to a few others who i recall supporting inclusion of this material
• 11:29 11:29, 13 June 2022 diff hist +986‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: developments
• 11:21 11:21, 13 June 2022 diff hist +863‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎"Legal experts considered Depp's chances of winning to be better in the US than the UK"?: reply
• 04:49 04:49, 13 June 2022 diff hist +15‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ →‎June 2022
• 04:46 04:46, 13 June 2022 diff hist +197‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ add
• 04:41 04:41, 13 June 2022 diff hist +29‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎No edit summary
• 04:41 04:41, 13 June 2022 diff hist +1,119‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ reply
• 02:29 02:29, 13 June 2022 diff hist +132‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎"Legal experts considered Depp's chances of winning to be better in the US than the UK"?
• 02:27 02:27, 13 June 2022 diff hist +301‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎"Legal experts considered Depp's chances of winning to be better in the US than the UK"?: expand
• 02:24 02:24, 13 June 2022 diff hist +932‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎"Legal experts considered Depp's chances of winning to be better in the US than the UK"?: Wholeheartedly agree
• 02:15 02:15, 13 June 2022 diff hist +365‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ additionally
• 02:12 02:12, 13 June 2022 diff hist +448‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ reply
• 02:09 02:09, 13 June 2022 diff hist +15,910‎ Depp v. Heard ‎ You have still not provided a policy basis for the removal of a referenced section content. Your citation of "Opinions are like arseholes" is not a justifiable reason to delete an entire section of content. These are statements made by reliable sources and you have not provided a policy basis to remove them Tags: Undo Reverted
• 01:26 01:26, 13 June 2022 diff hist −2‎ Free-to-play ‎ →‎See also
• 01:26 01:26, 13 June 2022 diff hist +2‎ Free-to-play ‎ →‎See also
• 01:26 01:26, 13 June 2022 diff hist +38‎ Free-to-play ‎ →‎See also: add some wikilinks to some other informative pages on this topic
• 01:20 01:20, 13 June 2022 diff hist +2,119‎ Depp v. Heard ‎ in the spirit of compromise i've restored the paragraph you added as well as an introduction to the restored section. However, I've added a sentence wholly consisting of direct quotations from the sources in addition to the previous material as I do not believe the previous characterization of the sources was apt Tag: Reverted
• 01:06 01:06, 13 June 2022 diff hist +141‎ User talk:173.56.203.56 ‎ reply
• 01:05 01:05, 13 June 2022 diff hist +13,791‎ Depp v. Heard ‎ that's not how WP:ONUS works this was longstanding content in the article that was deleted without consensus or justification. You have also not provided any justification for deleting the content. Please join the discussion on the talk page if you wish to express your views. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 00:52 00:52, 13 June 2022 diff hist +645‎ User talk:TheTimesAreAChanging ‎ →‎Greg Kaye: new section
• 00:47 00:47, 13 June 2022 diff hist +833‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Someone please Topic Ban Greg Kaye: new section Tag: Reverted
• 00:39 00:39, 13 June 2022 diff hist +13,791‎ Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Reactions: Partially restored section for which there was neither consensus nor justification for deletion. Please do a better job of justifying why this should be deleted on the talk page, apart from saying "the media is biased" and that it "whips up controversy." This is the analysis found in reliable mainstream media sources; if you don't like it, take it up with the media. This is not the place to win your political cause, this is an encylopedia that reports what media/academy says. Tag: Reverted
• 00:20 00:20, 13 June 2022 diff hist +41‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?
• 00:18 00:18, 13 June 2022 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?
• 00:17 00:17, 13 June 2022 diff hist +1,017‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?: reply

12 June 2022

• 21:18 21:18, 12 June 2022 diff hist +176‎ Free-to-play ‎ More important criticism and is mentioned in the article, belongs in the lead Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 20:45 20:45, 12 June 2022 diff hist +21‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: clarify
• 19:58 19:58, 12 June 2022 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus
• 19:57 19:57, 12 June 2022 diff hist +18‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?
• 19:56 19:56, 12 June 2022 diff hist +91‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: expand slightly
• 19:52 19:52, 12 June 2022 diff hist −12‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?
• 19:51 19:51, 12 June 2022 diff hist +284‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎Implications as a section title for the aftermath of Depp v Heard, or something else?
• 19:50 19:50, 12 June 2022 diff hist +985‎ Talk:Depp v. Heard ‎ →‎The lack of consensus: Are you serious? What is done in other articles is that editors don't edit the sources to make their quotations suit their political men's rights agendas because they t