08:4708:47, 23 February 2021diffhist+670
China Global Television Network
Undid revision 1008290099 by
Amigao (
talk): Okay. As if you meant to say that “pure opinion/commentary can't be sneaked-in through templates even though far more explicit dialogue is commonplace in discussions across the English Wikipedia. Then let's just say that my agitation owing to the lethargic state of the article and its sister's. But.. Pls don't imply that importing "opinion/commentary" in form of citations is fine, per EXTRAORDINARY.
16:5116:51, 22 February 2021diffhist+26
Al Arabiya
Page-protection requested over the persistent
WP:DE by a fellow static-IP editor based in
WP:DE with a SPA seemingly intent on
WP:ADVOCACY of removing all noticed references to the subject's links with Saudī royalty. They're so sloppy, they they recently also name a typo once and hence, got reverted by even "ClueBot" for “vandalism”. However.. Given their seemingly-established
WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT conduct, it does seem like they're
WP:SPA who're
WP:NOTHERE but
WP:POVPUSHTags: RevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web edit
15:4415:44, 22 February 2021diffhist+495
Al Arabiya
Undid revision 1007301606 by
5.31.4.167 (
talk): Resist with your overconfident editing, unless you want to expose yourselves to long-haul sanctions. Please understand. If you wanna push the idea that Al Arabiya has no direct-link with the Saudī royalty, then you must cite reliable sources. Otherwise, your highly-probable
WP:ADVOCACY is making you come across as
WP:SNEAKY. Now, even a bot has reverted you. No
WP: OR, eitherTag: Undo
15:3715:37, 22 February 2021diffhist+91
Al Arabiya
Undid revision 1007301381 by
5.31.4.167 (
talk): Kindly start citing your sources, instead of removing information without any attempt at explanation whatsoever. Urge you to
H:ES over how to formulate concise edit-summaries. And above all, you must go through
H:GS to start understanding what Wikipedia stands for. Remember, it's
not your rumour-mill.Tag: Undo
15:2815:28, 22 February 2021diffhist+2,351
Al Arabiya
Added the wikilinks to pre-existing content but above all: Fixed the slanted-phraseology with undesirable-connotation and updated the whole-coverage with new information added alongwith RS citations, per
WP:BALASP requirements in
WP:YESPOV — to convey the least. Hopefully, it's far more insightful, now.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
12:5812:58, 22 February 2021diffhist−52
CGTN (TV channel)
MINOR: Fixed some citations by removing redundant parameters from citations and saving namespace accordingly, changed one citation-template to a mere precise one; removed linkrot (dead-wikilinks) and reduced one
WP:OVERLINKTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
12:4112:41, 22 February 2021diffhist+710
China Global Television Network
In light of enlightenment.. Flagged the in-line statement supported by contextually questionable-sources. _Vide_ ‘|reason=’ parameter for sufficient-reasoning. The bottom-line: both of the citations either need to be replaced or the part of RSF's purported condemnation ought to be omitted.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
12:0912:09, 22 February 2021diffhist+173
CGTN (TV channel)
Yet a-gain...! Fixed the phraseology significantly after the similar-issues in the parent-article, but I must also add: Better sources seems to be sorely-needed, than a "LIVE" video-correspondence posted o/b/o
CNN Business. I could've improved better, had there been a more-concise source as doing so already would run afoul of
WP:OR.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
11:4611:46, 22 February 2021diffhist+78
China Global Television Network
My, goodness...! Yet-another article about an international news-outlet from a non-'Euro Christian' polity is so lethargically maintained.( Which includes, amongst other things: _Paraphrasing_ an entity's legal-name into a fictional body-corporate.) Anyhoo.. Fixed it by moderately rephrasing in-line with cited-sources per
WP:BALASP,
MOS:QUOTES &
MOS:UNDERLINK.Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
07:3207:32, 22 February 2021diffhist+66
Israel–Qatar relations
Undid revision 1007971737 by
Watchlonly (
talk): You should resist personally-attacking random editors over global lingua franca which is English, than posing to command knowledge of every single varieties of English since
WP:ENGVAR isn't applicable here. And especially given your own, pre-existing history of edit-warring — I would be nobody else's but your own welfare if you improved the “bad grammar” instead of
WP:ONLYREVERT.Tags: UndoReverted