00:2100:21, 15 October 2019diffhist−173
Rotten Tomatoes
This isn't the right place to make note of a rare exception, which it turns out was temporary. The film is not listed as Certified Fresh any more. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/joker_2019 Remove language tags, only relevant when not English. Other tidy.
23:4123:41, 14 October 2019diffhist+39
Selina Kyle (Batman Returns)
Text says "universal acclaim" that derserves more than a measly 3 reviews. Add Expand section tag again. (FWIW Ebert only gave the film 2/4, didn't say much about Pfeiffer.)
23:0323:03, 14 October 2019diffhist+724
The Cable Guy
Variety says Columbia paid $750,000 for the script and talks about Farley (not clear which existing references those facts came from if any) NYTimes also said $750,000.
21:2721:27, 14 October 2019diffhist−38
Ace Ventura: Pet Detective
Rotten Tomatoes is linked and further explanation is there if readers really need it. But if the wording is going to pedantically point out that the reviews are "assessed as positive or negative" it is simpler and clearer to specify how many reviews are actually assessed as positive or negative.Tag: Undo
19:0819:08, 14 October 2019diffhist−38
Ace Ventura: Pet Detective
Only my first edit can be accused of being "cookie cutter" (or simply consistent with other wikipedia film articles) but I did not repeat that edit. Detailed review breakdown for Rotten Tomatoes (same as Metacritic) actually ends up being less verbose and clearer than the awkward previous wording.