05:0405:04, 22 February 2022diffhist+14
Excalibur (film)
Dead link. Bots will hopefully add archive copy. As for "Obsolete source" I think it was merely a case of the article slightly overstating the point and perhaps only a rephrase is needed, perhaps boosting rather than launching careers.
04:5604:56, 22 February 2022diffhist+182
Bass Ackwards
Restore old information. Attempt to improve using automated tool reFill made it worse. Manually revert part of edit: 22:09, 18 December 2021 Derek R Bullamore talk contribs 5,856 bytes +390 Filled in 4 bare reference(s) with reFill 2
23:4323:43, 21 February 2022diffhist−194
Lucifer (TV series)
Revert unsourced speculation. A search for sources suggests this is wishful thinking at best. https://www.thewrap.com/lucifer-rory-spinoff-brianna-hildebrand-chloe-lucifer-future-daughter-netflix/ User did the same thing today in another article.Tag: Undo
23:3523:35, 21 February 2022diffhist−302
Transformers (film series)
Looked for but could not find sources (nevermind reliable sources, that should have already been included in the first place). This sounds like the proposed sequel to Transformers: The Last Knight again ... and a certain amount of wishful thinking from fans https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOKgT3DtGo0Tag: Reverted
14:4014:40, 21 February 2022diffhist−282
The Cuphead Show!
Source does not say that. It says there were 36 episodes ordered, not 48 (someone miscalculated 12+36 more). Also I don't see any sources specifically stating when the other tranches of episodes will be released. It is ''probable'' that it will be this year but it is not stated in any of the sources.
14:2814:28, 21 February 2022diffhist+524
The Cuphead Show!
Metacritic says "generally favorable reviews" and Rotten Tomatoes calls anything over 59% "fresh" ie positive so it is fair and accurate summary of the aggregators to say reviews were generally positive. (If the scores slide then we might have to consider
WP:WEIGHT but for now it is clear enough.)
14:0014:00, 21 February 2022diffhist−1
Uncharted (film)
→Critical response: Group negative reviews. Unclear why there was a paragraph break. I like ArsTechnica but of all the film critics you could pick why this one over an established critic from print media? Ditto Engadget, Polygon, etc.