28 December 2016

• 00:47 00:47, 28 December 2016 diff hist +13‎ Why Him? ‎ the figures are based on _reviews_ from critics, but the short summary of metacritic awkwardly shortens that to critics
• 00:42 00:42, 28 December 2016 diff hist −2‎ Doctor Strange (2016 film) ‎ Three significant figures is more than enough /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Archive_52#Rounding_Dollars_in_film_articles_and_Infoboxes

27 December 2016

• 19:30 19:30, 27 December 2016 diff hist −112‎ Cruel Intentions 3 ‎ →‎Plot: just the plot.
• 19:12 19:12, 27 December 2016 diff hist +19‎ Max Steel (film) ‎ Grammar. It is a a website that aggregates reviews, that makes it either review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes or review aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes.
• 19:06 19:06, 27 December 2016 diff hist +2‎ Love, Rosie (film) ‎ →‎Reception: RT 29%/51
• 19:03 19:03, 27 December 2016 diff hist −210‎ Love, Rosie (film) ‎ →‎Reception: User voted web polls are not a reliable source and IMDB polls can be easily ballot stuffed. Tag: references removed
• 19:00 19:00, 27 December 2016 diff hist +8‎ Green Lantern (film) ‎ →‎Reception: →‎Critical response: WP:MOSFILM
• 18:57 18:57, 27 December 2016 diff hist −79‎ Green Lantern (film) ‎ →‎Box office: shouldn't be necessary to specify that the box office information is "according to Box Office Mojo". Are the figures in any doubt? More than enough that the reference specify why the information comes from.
• 18:46 18:46, 27 December 2016 diff hist +20‎ Accepted ‎ use the same spacing as the Reflist for consistency.
• 18:29 18:29, 27 December 2016 diff hist +1,107‎ User talk:109.77.156.149 ‎No edit summary
• 16:10 16:10, 27 December 2016 diff hist +5‎ Max Steel (film) ‎ →‎Critical response: I strongly dislike the use of the word "reported" here, the interpret reviews to give them numbers according to their own formula, they don't objectively report like the score of a football game.
• 16:02 16:02, 27 December 2016 diff hist +28‎ Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom ‎ →‎Awards: WP:MOSFILM
• 16:02 16:02, 27 December 2016 diff hist +13‎ Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom ‎ →‎Critical response
• 15:56 15:56, 27 December 2016 diff hist +41‎ The Transporter ‎No edit summary
• 15:51 15:51, 27 December 2016 diff hist −14‎ Ric Young ‎ WP:RELTIME avoid "recent"
• 15:45 15:45, 27 December 2016 diff hist −60‎ Mirror Mirror (film) ‎No edit summary Tag: references removed
• 15:23 15:23, 27 December 2016 diff hist +489‎ Clea Strange ‎ update infobox
• 15:12 15:12, 27 December 2016 diff hist −4‎ Doctor Strange (2016 film) ‎ The definite article is entirely unncessary, and it isn't like Rotten Tomatoes is the only one, it is a review aggregation website, Metacritic is another.
• 12:09 12:09, 27 December 2016 diff hist −1‎ Doctor Strange (2016 film) ‎ →‎Plot: murder isn't very descriptive, they take his head off, it's quite dramatic. Seems too much to Mordo steals the energy and doesn't he actually kill Pangborn?
• 12:05 12:05, 27 December 2016 diff hist +26‎ Doctor Strange (2016 film) ‎ Add anchor to the section title I would have expected based on WP:MOSFILM.
• 12:02 12:02, 27 December 2016 diff hist +41‎ Doctor Strange (2016 film) ‎ Rotten Tomatoes is a website that aggregates reviews, it is not a website full of 'review aggregators'. Grammar.
• 11:57 11:57, 27 December 2016 diff hist +30‎ Doctor Strange (2016 film) ‎ Does someone actually object to a nice tidy infobox? If you're going to revert things at least follow the WP:SIMPLE rules and explain with an edit summary.
• 11:55 11:55, 27 December 2016 diff hist −1‎ Doctor Strange (2016 film) ‎ awkward and more than a little pedantic to explain the meaning of the word "librarian". rephrase the text.
• 11:51 11:51, 27 December 2016 diff hist +5‎ Doctor Strange (2016 film) ‎ box office up to date.
• 11:47 11:47, 27 December 2016 diff hist −389‎ Doctor Strange (2016 film) ‎ Tidy infobox, restore nice spacing like the Template:Infobox film has. WP:ALT doesn't describe very much, assumes readers know what traditional costume means. Other minor copyedit. Tag: references removed
• 11:41 11:41, 27 December 2016 diff hist +19‎ Bleed for This ‎No edit summary
• 11:40 11:40, 27 December 2016 diff hist +450‎ User talk:TropicAces ‎ →‎Reference errors on 17 December
• 11:37 11:37, 27 December 2016 diff hist +13‎ Bleed for This ‎ fix. same named reference used twice for difference websites
• 11:34 11:34, 27 December 2016 diff hist +36‎ Why Him? ‎ mixed or negative, pick one! mixed to negative is nonsense. Full plot including ending needed.
• 11:31 11:31, 27 December 2016 diff hist +79‎ Max Steel (film) ‎ It makes no sense to write "On Cinemascore", it barely even makes sense to write "On the Cinemascore website" because Cinemascore is a real company that polls real audiences.