Rugoconites is a
genus of
Ediacaran biota found as
fossils in the form of a circular or oval-like impression preserved in high relief, six or more centimeters in diameter. The fossils are surrounded by frills that have been interpreted (
Wade 1972) as sets of
tentacles. The bifurcating radial ribs, spreading from a central dome, serve to distinguish this
genus from the
spongePalaeophragmodictya, and may represent the channels of the
gastrovascular system.[1] Fossils of Rugoconites have been interpreted as early
sponges,[2] although this is countered by
Sepkoskiet al. (2002), who interpreted the organism as a free-swimming jellyfish-like
cnidarian; similar to Ovatoscutum.[3] However, the fossil is consistently preserved as a neat circular form and its general morphology does not vary, therefore a benthic and perhaps slow-moving or sessile lifestyle is more likely. Ivantstov &
Fedonkin (2002), suggest that Rugoconites may possess tri-radial
symmetry and be a member of the
Trilobozoa.[4]
Rugoconites have been reported in clusters; this may represent a social/colonial way of life, or simply accumulation by the action of currents, sea-floor processes, or possibly
preservational conditions.[5]
The Rugoconites genus may contain two species: Rugoconites enigmaticus and Rugoconites tenuirugosus, the latter being less dome-shaped and having smaller and more numerous radial ridges than the former.[6] However, due to the dubious nature of R. tenuirugosus, its taxonomy is still unclear, and it has been suggested that a new genus named Wadea should be erected for ''R." tenuirugosus.[7]
In 1966,
Martin Glaessner along with
Mary Wade unearthed the external mould of a form which possessed a small central disc that had eleven radiating lobes from its centre that they named Lorenzinites rarus.[8] This form was also compared to the top of some Rugoconites specimens.[8] The fossil of Lorenzinites rarus was, however, reconsidered to be a Rugoconites enigmaticus specimen despite his original observations and placed it along with the genus in the synonymy of Rugoconites.[9] The genus was then forgotten about and needs further examination.
Fedonkin, M.A.; Cope, J.C.W. (1985). "Precambrian Metazoans: The Problems of Preservation, Systematics and Evolution [and Discussion]". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 311 (1148): 27–45.
Bibcode:
1985RSPTB.311...27F.
doi:
10.1098/rstb.1985.0136.
JSTOR2396968.
Sepkoski, J.J.; Jablonski, D.; Foote, M. (2002). "A Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal Genera". Bulletins of American Paleontology (serial monograph). 363 (1). Paleontological Research Institution: 560.