The plastisphere consists of
ecosystems that have evolved to live in human-made
plastic environments. All plastic accumulated in marine ecosystems serves as a habitat for various types of microorganisms, with the most notable contaminant being
microplastics.[1][2] There are an estimate of about 51 trillion microplastics floating in the oceans.[3] Relating to the plastisphere, over 1,000 different species of microbes are able to inhabit just one of these 5mm pieces of plastic.[4]
Plastic pollution acts as a more durable "ship" than
biodegradable material for carrying the organisms over long distances.[5][6] This long-distance transportation can move
microbes to different ecosystems and potentially introduce
invasive species[1] as well as harmful algae.[7] The microorganisms found on the
plastic debris comprise an entire ecosystem of
autotrophs,
heterotrophs and
symbionts.[8] The microbial species found within plastisphere differ from other floating materials that naturally occur (i.e., feathers and algae) due to plastic's unique chemical nature and slow speed of biodegradation. In addition to microbes, insects have come to flourish in areas of the ocean that were previously uninhabitable. The
sea skater, for example, has been able to reproduce on the hard surface provided by the floating plastic.[9]
History
Discovery
The plastisphere was first described by a team of three scientists, Dr. Linda Amaral-Zettler from the Marine Biological Laboratory, Dr. Tracy Mincer from
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and Dr. Erik Zettler from
Sea Education Association.[10][11] They collected plastic samples during research trips to study how the microorganisms function and alter the ecosystem. They analyzed plastic fragments collected in nets from multiple locations within the Atlantic Ocean.[11] The researchers used a combination of
scanning electron microscopy and
DNA sequencing to identify the distinct microbial community composition of the plastisphere.[11] Among the most notable findings were "pit formers," crack and pit forming organisms that provide evidence of
biodegradation.[11][12] Moreover, pit formers may also have the potential to break down
hydrocarbons.[11] In their analysis, the researchers also found members of the
genusVibrio, a genus which includes the bacteria that cause
cholera and other gastrointestinal ailments.[13] Some species of Vibrio can glow, and it is hypothesized that this attracts fish that eat the organisms colonizing the plastic, which then feed from the stomachs of the fish.[14] Studies carried out in the
Baltic Sea[15] and in the
Mediterranean Sea,[16] also found microorganisms of the
genusVibrio, in
plastic films and fragments, and in plastic fibres, respectively.
Anthropogenic sources
Plastic itself was invented in 1907 by
Leo Baekeland using formaldehyde and phenol.[17] Since then, the material has been used in anything from clothes to
artificial heart valves. As a result, as of 2014 the use of plastic has increased twenty-fold since 1964, and it is expected to double by 2035.[18] Despite efforts to implement
recycling programs, recycling rates tend to be quite low. For instance, in the
EU, only 29% of the plastic consumed is recycled.[19] The plastic that does not reach a recycling facility or landfill, will most likely end up in our oceans due to accidental dumping of the waste, losses during transport, or direct disposal from boats.[19] In 2010, it was estimated that 4 to 12 million metric tons (Mt) of
plastic waste entered into marine ecosystems.[20]
The smaller, more inconspicuous microplastic particles have been aggregating in the oceans since the 1960s.[21] A more recent worry in the pollution of microplastics comes from the use of plastic films in agriculture. 7.4 million tons of plastic films are used each year to increase food production.[22] Scientists have found that microbial biofilms are able to form within 7–14 days on plastic film surfaces, and have the ability to alter the chemical properties of the soil and plants that we are ingesting.[23] Microplastics have been recorded everywhere, even the Arctic due to atmospheric circulation.[24]
Research
Diversity
Large scale sequencing studies have found
alpha diversities to be lower in the plastisphere relative to surrounding soil samples due to a decrease in
species richness in the plastisphere.[25][26][27][28] Polymer film fragments affect microbes in different ways, leading to mixed effects on microbial growth rates in the plastisphere.[25][28][29] Certain polymer degrading bacteria release toxic byproducts as a result of the degradation of the plant fragment, serving as a deterrent to the colonization of the plastisphere by susceptible species.[25] Phylogenetic diversity is also decreased in the plastisphere relative to nearby soil samples.[25]
The bacterial and microbial communities in the plastisphere are significantly different from those found in surrounding soil samples, creating a new
ecological niche within the ecosystem.[25][30][31] The specific growth of bacteria caused by film fragments is a primary cause for the creation of a unique bacterial community.[25][32] Changes in bacterial community composition over time in the plastisphere have also been shown to drive changes in surrounding land.[25][28][33]
In another study which looked at the factors influencing the diversity of the plastisphere, the researchers found that the highest degree of unique microorganisms tended to favor plastic pieces that were blue.[34]
A recent experiment carried across the
Atlantic Ocean and the
Mediterranean Sea aimed at studying the colonisation and genetic variety of plastics in the marine environment, identified
tardigrades in in situincubated plastics for the first time.[35]
Taxonomy
The growth of specific bacteria in their plastisphere occurs because of the ability of certain bacteria to degrade polymers. Phyla of bacteria that have increased presences in the plastisphere relative to soil samples without plastic micro-fragments include
Acidobacteria,
Actinobacteria,
Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes,
Planctomycetes, and
Proteobacteria.[25][36][37][38][39] Furthermore, bacteria of the order
Rhizobiales,
Rhodobacterales, and
Sphingomonadales are enriched in the plastisphere.[25] Interactions within the unique bacterial community composition in the plastisphere influence local
biogeochemical cycles and ecosystems'
food web interactions.
Community metabolism
The metabolism of bacterial communities in the plastisphere are enhanced.[25] KEGG Pathway enrichment analyses of plastisphere samples have also demonstrated increases in genetic and environmental information processing, cellular process, and organismal systems.[25] Enhanced metabolic functions for communities in the plastisphere include nitrogen metabolism, insulin signaling pathways, bacterial secretion,
organophosphorus compound metabolism, antioxidant metabolism, Vitamin B synthesis, chemotaxis, terpenoid quinone synthesis, sulfur metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, herbicide degradation, fatty acid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, ketone body pathways, lipopolysaccharide synthesis, alcohol degradation, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation, lipid metabolism, cofactor metabolism, cellular growth, cell motility, membrane transport, energy metabolism, and xenobiotics metabolism.[25][39][40][41]
Relationship to carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling
The presence of hydrocarbon degrading species in the plastisphere proposes a direct link between the plastisphere and the carbon cycle.[25][42][43] Metagenome analyses suggest that genes involved in carbon degradation, nitrogen fixation, organic nitrogen conversion, ammonia oxidation, denitrification, inorganic phosphorus solubilization, organic phosphorus mineralization, and phosphorus transporter production are enriched in the plastisphere, demonstrating the potential impact on biogeochemical cycles by the plastisphere.[25][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] Specific bacterial phyla present in the plastisphere due to their biodegradation abilities and their role in the carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycles include Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes.[25][42][43][51][52] Some carbon-degrading bacteria are able to use plastics as a food source.[53][54]
Research in the South Pacific Ocean has investigated the plastisphere's potential in CO2 and N2O contribution where fairly low greenhouse gas contributions by the plastisphere were noted. However, it was concluded that greenhouse gas contribution was dependent on the degree of nutrient concentration and the type of plastic.[55]
Significance to human health
KEGG Pathway enrichment analyses of plastisphere samples suggest that sequences related to human disease are enriched in the plastisphere.[25] Cholera causing Vibrio cholerae, cancer pathways, and toxoplasmosis sequences are enriched in the plastisphere.[13][25] Pathogenic bacteria are sustained in the plastisphere in part due to the adsorption of organic pollutants onto biofilms and their usage as nutrition.[25][39][40] Current research also aims to identify the relationship between the plastisphere and respiratory viruses and whether the plastisphere affects viral persistence and survival in the environment.[56]
Degradation by microorganisms
Some microorganisms present in the plastisphere have the potential to degrade plastic materials.[19] This could be potentially advantageous, as scientists may be able to utilize the microbes to break down plastic that would otherwise remain in our environment for centuries.[57] On the other hand, as plastic is broken down into smaller pieces and eventually
microplastics, there is a higher likelihood that it will be consumed by
plankton and enter into the
food chain.[58] As
plankton are eaten by larger organisms, the plastic may eventually cause there to be
bioaccumulation in fish eaten by humans.[58] The following table lists some microorganisms with biodegradation capacity[19]
Microorganisms and their biodegradation capacity[19]
Oftentimes the degradation process of plastic by microorganisms is quite slow.[19] However, scientists have been working towards genetically modifying these organisms in order to increase plastic
biodegradation potential. For instance, Ideonella sakaiensis has been genetically modified to break down
PET at faster rates.[68] Multiple chemical and physical pretreatments have also demonstrated potential in enhancing the degree of biodegradation of different polymers. For instance UV or c-ray irradiation treatments, have been used to heighten the degree of biodegradation of certain plastics.[19]
^Sánchez, C. (2020). Fungal potential for the degradation of petroleum-based polymers: An overview of macro- and microplastics biodegradation. Biotechnology Advances, 40, 107501.
doi:
10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107501
^Loeppmann S, Blagodatskaya E, Pausch J,
Kuzyakov Y (January 2016). "Substrate quality affects kinetics and catalytic efficiency of exo-enzymes in rhizosphere and detritusphere". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 92: 111–118.
doi:
10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.020.
ISSN0038-0717.
^Li Y, Lin M, Ni Z, Yuan Z, Liu W, Ruan J, Tang Y, Qiu R (March 2020). "Ecological influences of the migration of micro resin particles from crushed waste printed circuit boards on the dumping soil". Journal of Hazardous Materials. 386: 121020.
doi:
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121020.
ISSN0304-3894.
PMID31874765.
S2CID209474917.
^
abWolińska A, Kuźniar A, Zielenkiewicz U, Izak D, Szafranek-Nakonieczna A, Banach A, Błaszczyk M (October 2017). "Bacteroidetes as a sensitive biological indicator of agricultural soil usage revealed by a culture-independent approach". Applied Soil Ecology. 119: 128–137.
Bibcode:
2017AppSE.119..128W.
doi:
10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.06.009.
ISSN0929-1393.
^Upadhyay SK, Singh DP, Saikia R (2009-08-22). "Genetic Diversity of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria Isolated from Rhizospheric Soil of Wheat Under Saline Condition". Current Microbiology. 59 (5): 489–496.
doi:
10.1007/s00284-009-9464-1.
ISSN0343-8651.
PMID19701667.
S2CID10672506.
^Hayden HL, Drake J, Imhof M, Oxley AP, Norng S, Mele PM (October 2010). "The abundance of nitrogen cycle genes amoA and nifH depends on land-uses and soil types in South-Eastern Australia". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 42 (10): 1774–1783.
doi:
10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.06.015.
ISSN0038-0717.
^Rodríguez H, Fraga R, Gonzalez T, Bashan Y (2007), "Genetics of phosphate solubilization and its potential applications for improving plant growth-promoting bacteria", First International Meeting on Microbial Phosphate Solubilization, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 15–21,
doi:
10.1007/978-1-4020-5765-6_2,
ISBN978-1-4020-4019-1
^Luo G, Sun B, Li L, Li M, Liu M, Zhu Y, Guo S, Ling N, Shen Q (December 2019). "Understanding how long-term organic amendments increase soil phosphatase activities: Insight into phoD- and phoC-harboring functional microbial populations". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 139: 107632.
doi:
10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107632.
ISSN0038-0717.
S2CID208554425.
^Hirai H, Takada H, Ogata Y, Yamashita R, Mizukawa K, Saha M, Kwan C, Moore C, Gray H, Laursen D, Zettler ER, Farrington JW, Reddy CM, Peacock EE, Ward MW (August 2011). "Organic micropollutants in marine plastics debris from the open ocean and remote and urban beaches". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 62 (8): 1683–1692.
Bibcode:
2011MarPB..62.1683H.
doi:
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.06.004.
ISSN0025-326X.
PMID21719036.
^Paço, A., Duarte, K., da Costa, J. P., Santos, P. S. M., Pereira, R., Pereira, M. E., ... Rocha- Santos, T. A. P. (2017). Biodegradation of polyethylene microplastics by the marine fun- gus Zalerion maritimum. The Science of the Total Environment, 586, 10–15.
doi:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.017