Louis Veuillot (11 October 1813 – 7 March 1883) was a French journalist and author who helped to popularize
ultramontanism (a philosophy favoring Papal supremacy).
Career overview
Veuillot was born of humble parents in
Boynes (
Loiret). When he was five years of age, his parents relocated to Paris. With little education, he gained employment in a lawyer's office, and was sent in 1830 to serve with a newspaper of
Rouen, and afterwards to
Périgueux. Initially, Veuillot supported the
July Monarchy of
Louis Phillippe criticizing both Republicans and supporters of the deposed
Bourbon Dynasty.[1]
He returned to Paris in 1837, and a year later visited Rome during
Holy Week. There he embraced
ultramontane sentiments, and became an ardent champion of
Catholicism. The results of his conversion were published in Pélerinages en Suisse (1839), Rome et Lorette (1841) and other publications.[2] Veuillot's embrace of Ultramontanism led to his violent rejection of Bourgeois society and norms.[3] He had little regard for theological nuance and held fast to the overall philosophies of
Joseph de Maistre and
Louis de Bonald, the original Catholic
counter-revolutionary thinkers.[4]
In 1840, Veuillot joined the staff of the newspaper Univers Religieux, a journal created in 1833 by
Abbé Migne, and soon helped make it the leading organ of ultramontane propaganda as L'Univers. His methods of journalism, which made great use of
irony and ad hominem criticism,[5] had already provoked more than one duel, and he was imprisoned for a brief time for his polemics against the
University of Paris. In 1848, he became editor of the newspaper, which was suppressed in 1860,[6] but revived in 1867, when Veuillot resumed his ultramontane propaganda, causing a second suppression of his journal in 1874.[7] Veuillot then occupied himself by writing polemical pamphlets[8] against
liberal Catholics, the
Second French Empire and the Italian government.
His services to the
papal see were recognized by
Pope Pius IX, on whom he wrote (1878) a monograph.[2]Matthew Arnold said of him:
M. Louis Veuillot is a polemic worthy of the golden age of polemics. He is singly devoted to ultramontanism; he lives on a small fixed salary from the proprietors of the Univers; he is a man of the purest and simplest domestic life; he is poor, and has a large family, but he has refused all offers of place and salary from the government, and maintains his entire independence.[9]
[Veuillot] manifests the temper and breeding of a fanatic, and seems to act on the principle that whoever differs on any important point in history, politics, or philosophy, from himself, must needs be a bad Catholic, or no Catholic at all. We question not his sincerity, we question not his personal piety; but we do question his qualification to be a Catholic leader. His mind is too narrow and one-sided for that, and his leadership, with the best intentions on his part, is fitted only to bring about the very results he most deprecates. Notwithstanding his hostility to those who regret the loss of parliamentary freedom, and his devotion to Imperialism, he has not been able to save his journal from an avertissement; and it would seem that, after having aided in erecting an Absolute government for his country, and in breaking down all the safeguards established by constitutionalism to freedom of thought, freedom of speech, and public discussion, the police have had the cruelty to take him at his word, and give him a taste of the despotism he has been willing to fasten upon others.[10]
Some of his papers were collected in Mélanges Religieux, Historiques et Littéraires (12 vols., 1857–1875), and his Correspondance (7 vols., 1883–85) has great political interest. His younger brother, Eugène Veuillot, published (1901–1904) a comprehensive and valuable life, Louis Veuillot.
After the
First Vatican Council, Veuillot's influence began to wane. In 1879 Pope Pius IX[clarification needed] released a letter praising him, but also regretting his "bitter zeal" in advocating his views. Among the lower clergy Veuillot retained influence. Politically he returned to advocating the restorations of the Bourbon Monarchy under
Henri, Count of Chambord.[11]
Anti-Semitism
Veuillot was a virulent anti-Semite. As early as the 1840s, he wrote articles in L'Univers defaming Jews, portraying them as alien vagabonds, accusing them of
blood libel, and asserting that the Talmud commanded Jews to hate all Christians.[12][13] He contemptuously dismissed Jews who criticized him as "the deicide people", claiming they were a foreign element which plotted to control all of French society.[14] Veuillot's hatred intensified during the
Mortara case to the point where it put him at odds with
Napoleon III whom he had previously supported, causing the latter to temporarily suppress the journal.[12] Veuillot's two-pronged assault on the Jews and liberalism would influence the anti-Semitism of
Édouard Drumont, who worked for L'Univers in his youth.[15] Drumont, who in his turn was an employer of
Charles Maurras, was admired by
Karl Lueger, whom
Adolf Hitler acknowledged as an influence in Mein Kampf.[16]
Legacy
A misattributed quote to Veuillot, "When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles", is quoted in
Frank Herbert's
Children of Dune.
^"In Paris M. Louis Veuillot has given us another shameful specimen of Ultramontanism. Not satisfied with comparing savants to the phylloxera, he likens Protestantism to a loathsome disease whose name is usually confined to medical works." —
"The Jesuits in France,"The New York Times, August 16, 1875, p. 4.
^"An impetuous, brutal journalist, whose verve and ardour came from Rabelais and Voltaire through Joseph de Maistre, Louis Veuillot was at the same time an exquisite writer and a violent Christian; he distributed holy water as though it were vitriol and handled the crucifix like a club." — Hanotaux, Gabriel (1905).
Contemporary France. London: Archibald Constable & Co., p. 622.
^Arnold, Matthew (1960). "England and the Italian Question." In: On the Classical Tradition, R. H. Super (Ed.), University of Michigan Press, p. 89.
^Greene, Benjamin H. (1857). Brownson's Quarterly Review, Volume 2. New York: E. Dunigan and Brother. p. 398.
^
abLevy, Richard S. (2005). Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution, Volume 1. ABC-CLIO. p. 738.
^Kaplan, Zvi Jonathan (2009). Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea?: French Jewry and the Problem of Church and State. Society of Biblical Lit. p. 65.
^Michael, R. (2008). A History of Catholic Antisemitism: The Dark Side of the Church. Springer. p. 128.
Isser, Natalie (1979). "The Mortara Affair and Louis Veuillot," Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Western Society for French History7, pp. 69–78.
Laurioz, Pierre-Yves (2005). Louis Veuillot: Soldat de Dieu. Éd. de Paris, 2005.
Le Roux, Benoît (1984). Louis Veuillot: Un Homme, un Combat. Paris: Téqui, 1984.
McMillan, James F. “Remaking Catholic Europe: Louis Veuillot and the Ultramontane Project.” Kirchliche Zeitgeschichte 14, no. 1 (2001): 112–22.
JSTOR43100025
Menczer, Béla (1962).
"Louis Veuillot." In: Catholic Political Thought, 1789-1848. University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 192–196.
Myers, Rev. E. (1903).
"Louis Veuillot,"The Catholic World77, pp. 597–610.
Neill, Thomas Patrick (1951).
"Louis Veuillot." In: They Lived the Faith; Great Lay Leaders of Modern Times. Milwaukee: The Bruce Publishing Company, pp. 299–324.
Nielsen, Fredrik Kristian (1906). The History of the Papacy in the XIXth Century,Vol. 2. London: John Murray.
Soltau, Roger Henry (1959).
"Veuillot and L'Univers." In: French Political Thought in the 19th Century. New York: Russell & Russell, pp. 176–188.
Sparrow-Simpson, W.J. (1918).
"Louis Veuillot." In: French Catholics in the Nineteenth Century. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, pp. 107–121.
Spencer, Philip (1954). Politics of Belief in Nineteenth-Century France: Lacordaire, Michon, Veuillot. London: Faber and Faber.