The loros (
Greek: λῶρος,
romanized: lôros) was a long, narrow and embroidered cloth, which was wrapped around the torso and dropped over the left hand. It was one of the most important and distinctive parts of the most formal and ceremonial type of imperial
Byzantine costume, worn only by the Imperial family and a few of the most senior officials. It developed out of the trabea triumphalis of the
Roman consuls. There were different male and female versions.[1] Byzantine sources speak of the "loros costume" as the loros dictated the rest of the imperial outfit. The slightly less formal, and more secular, imperial costume, which was also that normally worn by high officials on official occasions, was the chlamys costume.[2] Underneath either the loros or the chlamys were worn the divetesion (διβητήσιον), a long silk robe, and a tunic.[3]
Male
The first representations of the loros are on coins from the reign of
Justinian II (r. 685–695 and 705–711).[4] Until the 10th century, the male loros was wrapped around the torso in a specific way, following the ancient trabea. However, increasingly from the 11th century, the loros acquired a new design. The new loros had a loop that went round the neck and was pulled on over the head.[5] By the
Komnenian dynasty, the old loros was completely abandoned, after a period when both designs are seen.[6] By the 14th century the strip down the front may have been sewn onto the tunic beneath, and the loros may have been called a diadema instead.[7] Despite the modifications, the loros was the most important part of the imperial costume up until the
end of the empire in the 15th century.
Although in practice it was, according to the De Ceremoniis by
Constantine VII, worn only in exceptional occasions such as on
Easter Sunday,
Pentecost, sometimes other feasts, and to receive important foreign visitors, the loros was an integral part of imperial portraiture. In earlier periods it was worn in triumphal processions.[8]
The loros was also worn at Easter by the "twelve dignitaries", holders of the ranks of magistros and anthypatos, as well as by the
Eparch of Constantinople and the zoste patrikia during the ceremonies of their promotion.[9] It was said to symbolize the
winding-sheet of Christ, with the officials as the
Twelve Apostles.[10] It is also worn by
archangels in
Byzantine art,[11] which spread to medieval art in the West, as they were regarded as the high officials of God. It seems the loros-costume was not worn at the coronation of the Emperor, although he was given it in the course of the ceremony, and when crowned by Christ in art always wears it.[12]
At first empresses wore essentially the same form as emperors, but from around the 9th century a new style appears. The hanging end was longer and much broader, and after reaching down to the ankles turned upwards to be folded over the left forearm, or fastened or tucked into the belt. The wide end has the appearance in paintings of a round-topped shield tapering to a point, at an oblique angle.[14] In the 13th century this shield shape is no longer seen, and the female form returns to being that of the now modified male one for the last phase of the empire.[15] Empresses also wore a wide jewelled "superhumeral" collar in matching styles to the loros, and perhaps attached to it. This was the distinctive garment of empresses and also worn on other occasions, and copied by other upper-class women; the modified male loros created much the same effect.
Gallery
A Roman consul wearing the trabea triumphalis, 517 AD
Constantine VII wearing the traditional loros though not accurately wrapped, 945 AD
The
Romanos Ivory showing emperor Romanos wearing an accurate modified loros, probably 945–949 AD
John II Komnenos. Although the relief is anachronistic and the emperor wears simultaneously both the loros and the chlamys (the coat on top), something which was never the practice, the wrapping of the loros beneath is carved accurately, 1143 AD.
Parani, Maria G. (2003). Reconstructing the Reality of Images: Byzantine Material Culture and Religious Iconography (11th–15th Centuries. Leiden: Brill.
ISBN9004124624.