This article needs additional citations for
verification. (July 2020) |
Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr | |
---|---|
Argued December 9, 2019 Decided March 23, 2020 | |
Full case name | Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr |
Docket no. | 18-776 |
Citations | 589
U.S. ___ (
more) 140 S. Ct. 1062; 206
L. Ed. 2d 271 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Case history | |
Prior | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Breyer, joined by Roberts, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh |
Dissent | Thomas, joined by Alito (all but Part II–A–1) |
Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case. The question before the Court was, "Is a request for equitable tolling, as it applies to statutory motions to reopen, judicially reviewable as a question of law?" [1]
In a 7–2 decision written by Justice Breyer, the court ruled that the request for equitable tolling was judicially reviewable as a question of law, the court vacated and remanded the case. [2]
This section is empty. You can help by
adding to it. (March 2023) |