Glioblastoma arising in an astrocytoma. This spinal cord exhibits both a lightly staining microcystic astrocytoma as well as a darkly staining
glioblastoma.
The concept of grading of the tumors of the central nervous system, agreeing for such the regulation of the "progressiveness" of these
neoplasias (from benign and localized
tumors to malignant and infiltrating tumors), dates back to 1926 and was introduced by P. Bailey and H. Cushing,[1]
in the elaboration of what turned out the first systematic classification of gliomas.[2]
In the following, the grading systems present in the current literature are introduced. Then, through a table, the more relevant are compared.
ICD-O scale
MRI of a diffuse
astrocytoma with differing degrees of differentiation.
The first edition of the
International Classification of Diseases (ICD) dates back to 1893. The current review (
ICD-10) dates back to 1994, came into use in the U.S. in 2015, and is revised yearly, being very comprehensive.[citation needed]
In 1976 the
World Health Organization (WHO) published the first edition of the
International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O), which is now at the third edition (ICD-O-3, 2000).
In this last edition, the Arabic numeral after the character "/" indicates the "behavior" of the neoplasia, with the following meaning:[3]
/9 malignant neoplasia, uncertain if primitive or secondary
For the concepts of benign and malignant neoplasia see
Tumor and
Cancer.
For primary and secondary neoplasias see
Metastasis.
A brain tumor composed of benign cells, but located in a vital area (as the brain is), can be considered to be life-threatening — although the tumor and its cells would not be classified as malignant.[citation needed]
Kernohan grading
Macroscopic pathology of glioblastoma.
The Kernohan grading system[4][5]
defines progressive malignancy of
astrocytomas as follows:
The St Anne-Mayo grading system[4][6][7]
also is used to grade astrocytomas; however, this system uses four morphologic criteria to assign a grade:[citation needed]
The St. Anne-Mayo grade has four categories of tumors:[citation needed]
Grade 1 tumors do not meet any of the criteria.
Grade 2 tumors meet one criterion, usually nuclear atypia.
Grade 3 tumors meet two criteria, usually nuclear atypia and mitosis.
Grade 4 tumors meet three or four of the criteria.
WHO grading
Pilocytic astrocytoma. Nuclear hyperchromasia and pleomorphism are common. Note the typical cellular elongation, and, at the center of the illustration, the eosinophilic granular body that populates
pilocytic astrocytomas and certain other slowly growing
gliomas.
The World Health Organization (WHO) grading system[4][8][9][10]
is contained in the volume Histological Typing of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, whose first edition dates back to 1979 (now up to the 5th edition, published online in 2021).
The WHO grade has four categories of tumors:
Grade 1 tumors are slow-growing, nonmalignant, and associated with long-term survival.
Grade 2 tumors are relatively slow-growing but sometimes recur as higher grade tumors. They can be nonmalignant or malignant.
Grade 3 tumors are malignant and often recur as higher grade tumors.
Grade 4 tumors reproduce rapidly and are very aggressive malignant tumors.
Roman numerals (I – IV) were used unitl the 5th edition (2021) of the WHO classification of CNS tumors.
From the histological point of view the WHO system is based on the same criteria as the St Anne-Mayo system.[11][12]
Comparison of the grading systems
In the following table the various grading systems are compared (the IDC-O scale is not comprised because it is not considered a real grading system):[13][14][15]
^
Bailey P, Cushing H (1926). A classification of the tumors of the glioma group on a histogenic basis with a correlated study of prognosis.
J B Lippincott Co. Philadelphia.
^
Tonn J-C, Westphal M, Rutka JT, Grossman SA (2006). Neuro-Oncology of CNS Tumors
Springer Science & Business,
ISBN3-540-25833-7.
^
Kernohan JW, Mabon RF, Svien HJ, Adson AW (1949). A Semplified classification of gliomas.
Proc. Staff: Meet. Mayo Clin. 24: 71-75.
^
Daumas-Duport C, Scheithauer B, O'Fallon J, Kelly P (1988). Grading of astrocytomas. A simple and reproducible method.
Cancer 62: 2152-2165.
^
Kim TS, Halliday AL, Hedley W, Convery K (1991). Correlates of survival and the Daumas-Duport grading system for astrocytomas.
J Neurosurg 74: 27-37.
^
Kleihues P, Burger PC, Scheithauer BW (1993). Histological Typing of Tumours of Central Nervous System. World Health Organization International Histological Classification of Tumours.
2nd ed. Springer Verlag: Berlin Heidelberg.
^
Kleihues P, Kiessling M, Scheithauer BW (1987). The new WHO classification of brain tumours.
Brain Pathol. 3: 255-268.
^Acta Neuropathol. 2007 Aug;114(2):97-109. Epub 2007 Jul 6. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Scheithauer BW, Kleihues P. Source Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
^
Kleihues P, Cavenee WK, eds. (2000). Pathology and genetics of tumours of the nervous system. World Health Organization classification of tumours.
Lyon, France: IARC Press
ISBN92-832-2409-4.
Bibliography
Kleihues P, Cavenee WK, eds. (2000). Pathology and genetics of tumours of the nervous system. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press
ISBN92-832-2409-4.
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (eds) (2007). World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. IARC, Lyon
ISBN92-832-2430-2.