Thanks for replying, I'm so happy they got redesigned and I'm so sad some are not following the color scheme we are trying to adapt. Thanks again
Ladsgroupoverleg21:58, 28 May 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Ladsgroup: I think most of the original debate was over the "design" and not so much over the shade of colors - if you want to tackle this in toto check over all of the colors and make one discussion post for all the shade variants you'd want to change with a before->after comparison. —
xaosfluxTalk22:12, 28 May 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Ladsgroup: no, as the RfC is 2 years more recent then that request. However, it is good background and I'd include it in a a discussion at
WP:VPR or another widely attended venue. —
xaosfluxTalk22:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Ladsgroup: the current images are marked as public-domain, the version you uploaded you licensed as (CC BY-SA 4.0). It is also claimed that the current are not eligible for copyright due to their composition. Do you agree to re-release these 4 uploads as public domain? (
1,
2,
3,
4). Thank you, —
xaosfluxTalk00:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
This is mostly so that we can target clicks on the images to go to the wikipedia pages, not to the image descriptions for attribution. —
xaosfluxTalk00:43, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Done@
Ladsgroup: I've executed this by creating a new version of the files, this may take some time to update in page and thumnail caches. Please review and let me know if you see any issues. —
xaosfluxTalk13:26, 17 July 2019 (UTC)reply