In Ex Parte Estate Davies, an important case in
South African succession law, the
testatorbequeathed £2000 in his
will to a person who was not named in the will itself, but on a document which was in a sealed envelope given to his
attorney. This document was not signed by
witnesses.
The question before the
court was thus whether this was a valid disposition. The court held that the disposition was invalid, because the testator did not comply with the statutory formalities regarding witnesses and signatures, as well as the fact that the identity of the
beneficiary was not disclosed in the will.
The Law of South Africa. 2nd Ed. LexisNexis. 2003. Volume 31. Paras 224, 240, 325 & 326.
The Law of South Africa.
Volume 31. Butterworths. Durban and Pretoria. 1988. Paras 158 and 171. pp 103, 119 & 160.
H R Hahlo and Ellison Kahn.The Union of South Africa: The Development of Its Laws and Constitution. (The British Commonwealth, vol 5:
[1][2]). Stevens & Sons. London. Juta & Company. South Africa. 1960. pp 629 & 637.
Dale Hutchinson (ed). Wille's Principles of South African Law.
8th Ed. Juta & Co Ltd. Cape Town, Wetton and Johannesberg. 1991. pp 364 & 369.
Kellaway. Principles of Legal Interpretation of Statutes, Contracts and Wills. Butterworths. Durban. 1995. pp 534, 593 & 594.
[3]
H J Erasmus and W J de Waal. The South African Law of Succession. Butterworths. 1989.
[4]
Heaton and Roos. Family and Succession Law in South Africa. 3rd Ed. Kluwer Law. 2019.
Note 1256
Angela Beumker. Die Testamentsformen in Südafrika und ihre geschichtliche Entwicklung. Lit Verlag. Munster, Hamburg and London. 2000.
p 93.
Marius J de Waal. "Testamentary Formalities in South Africa". Reid, de Waal and Zimmermann. Testamentary Formalities. (Comparative Succession Law, vol 1). Oxford University Press. 2011.
p 386.
James T Faber, "Uncertainty About the Condonation of Formally Non-Compliant Wills, and the Rectification of Cross-Signed Mirror Wills" (2022) 25 Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regstydskrif, p 2
[5]