Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,275 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 26 February 2024 by
ToadetteEdit (
talk). This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 13 July 2023 by
RPSkokie (
talk). This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by
RPSkokie 10 months ago. |
Submission declined on 11 July 2023 by
RPSkokie (
talk). This submission has been declined for one or more of the following reasons: Declined by
RPSkokie 10 months ago.
|
The UAE-orchestrated smear scandal in Europe refers to a series of confidential documents that claimed the UAE responsibility of smear campaigns targeting individuals and organizations in Europe. The 78,000 confidential documents revealed by Mediapart showed that the UAE has employed Alp Services, a Geneva-based company, to target individuals and organizations believed to have affiliations with Qatar or the Muslim Brotherhood in various locations throughout Europe. [1]
Between 2017 and 2020, UAE officials supervised Alp Services in locating and gathering information on individuals and organizations believed to have connections or associations with Qatar or the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe. The Geneva-based company conduct extensive research, including individuals such as politicians, lawyers, human rights organizations and activists, businesspersons, researchers, Muslim associations, and humanitarian or charitable NGOs. [2] As a result, Alp Services has successfully compiled a list of over 1000 names, along with corresponding addresses and, in some cases, mobile phone numbers of individuals residing in 18 European countries, including Switzerland, France, Belgium, England, Netherlands, Italy, Germany, and Austria. France was among the most targeted countries, with 191 individuals and 125 organizations. [3] [4]
This significant and diverse data were presented to the Abu Dhabi Secret Service in the form of infographics. Subsequently, the Alp Services embarked on discrediting the "enemies of the Emirates" by disseminating offensive information covertly and extensively, thereby influencing public opinion and decision-makers in Europe. Upon preparing the targets, UAE officials could request services from the company to attack specific targets, costing between €20,000 and €50,000 per target. [5]
The strategy employed focused on launching press campaigns and publishing articles through fake authors. Moreover, modifications were made to Wikipedia pages to manipulate information, and in certain cases, banks were convinced to close the accounts of the targeted individuals or organizations, which ultimately led to their bankruptcy. The documents also alleged that espionage operations included the monitoring and photographing of certain targets. [6]
Leaked documents indicate that Alp Services received over 5.7 million euros between 2017 and 2020 through an Emirati research center called "Al-Aryaf," ostensibly serving as a cover for Emirati intelligence services. [7] [8]
According to the Mediapart leaks, they were notable figures among the targets list such as Zakia Khattabi, Belgium country's federal minister for environment and sustainability, Benoît Hamon, the former candidate for the French presidential elections, Samia Ghali, assistant mayor of Marseille and former senator, writer and director Rokhaya Diallo, and even the CNRS, the French public body responsible for scientific research. The list also included the Alkarama foundation for Human Rights, Pascal Gemberly, secretary general of the Vaudois Union of Muslim Associations (UVAM), Islamic Relief Worldwide (IRW), and businessman Hazem Nada. [9]
While the Alp services said that the leaked documents are stolen and partly falsified, UAE government declined to comment on the allegations. Regarding the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, which is responsible for overseeing private security companies operating in Switzerland, it stated that, they have not received any reports where a foreign state was identified as the main or ultimate beneficiary. [10]
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)