Submission declined on 3 July 2024 by Cabrils ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Cabrils 9 days ago. Last edited by Cabrils 9 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

• Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:NJOURNALS) but presently it is not clear that it does.
  As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’.
  Please note that the references are not from sources that are considered reliable for establishing notability.
  Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link).
  Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject.
  It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NJOURNAL criteria #3, because XXXXX").
  You may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils ( talk) 04:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Transactions on Machine Learning Research

Discipline	Machine Learning
Language	English
Edited by	Kyunghyun Cho, Gautam Kamath, Hugo Larochelle, Naila Murray
Publication details
History	2022-present
Publisher	Journal of Machine Learning Research Inc.
Open access	Yes
Standard abbreviations ISO 4 ( alt) · Bluebook ( alt1 · alt2) NLM ( alt) · MathSciNet ( alt )
ISO 4	Transact Mach Learn Res.
Indexing CODEN ( alt) · JSTOR ( alt) · LCCN ( alt) MIAR · NLM ( alt) · Scopus
ISSN	2835-8856
Links
Journal homepage

Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal covering machine learning. It is a sister journal of the Journal on Machine Learning Research and was established in 2022. The journal was founded by Hugo Larochelle, Kyunghyun Cho, and Raia Hadsell. ^[1]

The advisory board includes Yoshua Bengio, Andrew McCallum, Bernhard Schölkopf and Lillian Lee (computer scientist).

History

The journal was founded with the aim of providing fast, conference-style review cycles and aims to prioritize novelty and scientific correctness over subjective significance.

The journal offers several awards, including an Outstanding Paper Certification and a Featured Paper Certification. In 2024, authors of papers awarded one of these certifications were invited to present their research in poster format at the International Conference on Learning Representations. ^[2]

References