Submission declined on 15 March 2024 by Cabrils (
talk).
This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the
talk page of a
relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant
WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.
Comment: There is currently a redirect from the title of this draft. If this draft is accepted, the redirect should be deleted, because the hatnote at the top of this page will take its place.You may ask about
redirects and
hatnotes at
the Teahouse.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 01:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including
WP:GNG,
WP:ANYBIO) but presently it is not clear that it does. As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple publishedsecondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles
‘Your First Article’,
‘Referencing for Beginners’ and
‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that many of the references are not from sources that are considered reliable for establishing notability and should be removed (including blogs, company websites, Twitter, YouTube). Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like a CV, which
Wikipedia is not. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid--which seems highly likely given the photo of Rosso was uploaded by you and you identified as your "Own Work"--you have a
conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the
draft's talk page, the
WP:THREE best sources that establish
notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:ANYBIO criteria #3, because XXXXX"). You may also wish to leave a note for me on
my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.
Cabrils (
talk) 00:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Not sure whether to accept or decline! Would appreciate another set of eyes. Sarah has plenty of passing mentions in articles but hasn't quite reached
WP:SIGCOV.... right?
Crunchydillpickle🥒 (
talk) 20:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Sarah Rosso (born April 13, 1982) is an American
LGBTQ+public health leader and educator who lives in
Pittsburgh, PA, and is the Executive Director of the Hugh Lane Wellness Foundation.
Life and work
Rosso serves on the Pennsylvania Commission on LGBTQ Affairs, where they are Co-Chair of the Youth and Young Adult Committee, and on the City of Pittsburgh LGBTQ+ Commission, the
PA Covid Equity Committee,[1]Allegheny County COVID Equity Task Force,[2] and the Allegheny County "All in Allegheny - Healthy Families and High Quality Human Services" Policy Committee.[3] Rosso was a Pittsburgh Magazine 40 Under 40 honoree in 2019.[4]
In 2019, after five years as the Director of Programs for the LGBTQ+ mental health organization Persad Center, Rosso became the Executive Director of Hugh Lane Wellness Foundation. Hugh Lane Wellness Foundation works to raise health with LGBTQ+ and HIV communities by removing systemic barriers that prevent health equity.[5] During their tenure, Rosso has more than the doubled the size of the Hugh Lane team, and expanded its service areas across Western Pennsylvania, including Washington and Erie Counties.[5]
Youth and family work
Rosso is well-known for their work supporting LGBTQ+ youth and families.[6][7][8][9][10] Rosso travels the country facilitating trainings for the
Human Rights Campaign's "All Families Training Program", offering capacity building and coaching on a range of topics for child welfare professionals and caregivers.[11][12] Under Rosso, Allegheny County began contracting with Hugh Lane to train foster parents in LGBTQ+ competency, using a training program called Caregiver AFFIRM. Rosso oversaw a pilot of Caregiver AFFIRM,[13][14] and co-wrote the training manual AFFIRM Caregiver Implementation.[15][16]