Submission declined on 26 March 2024 by
GraziePrego (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 25 March 2024 by
Jamiebuba (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Jamiebuba 3 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 25 March 2024 by
GraziePrego (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
GraziePrego 3 months ago. | ![]() |
Peter Hudis | |
---|---|
![]() |
Peter Hudis is an American philosopher, author, and academic known for his work in the fields of Hegelian philosophy, Marxism, and critical race theory. He is a Professor of Humanities and Philosophy at Oakton Community College and has contributed extensively to Marxist-humanist scholarship through his writings and editorial work. [1] [2] Hudis's notable works include Marx’s Concept of the Alternative to Capitalism and Frantz Fanon: Philosopher of the Barricades. He has also co-edited several volumes, such as The Power of Negativity: Selected Writings on the Dialectic in Hegel and Marx (with Kevin B. Anderson), The Rosa Luxemburg Reader, and The Letters of Rosa Luxemburg (with Annelies Laschitza and George Adler). Additionally, Hudis serves as the General Editor of The Complete Works of Rosa Luxemburg, a projected 16-volume collection, and is a member of the International Marxist-Humanist Organization. [3] [4]
Peter Hudis's academic and literary contributions span across various dimensions of social and political theory. His scholarship primarily focuses on the works of Karl Marx, Rosa Luxemburg, Frantz Fanon, and Raya Dunayevskaya. Through his research, Hudis explores themes of emancipation, dialectical philosophy, and the critique of capitalism. [5]
Hudis has played a pivotal role in the dissemination of Marxist and socialist literature through his editorial contributions. His work on The Complete Works of Rosa Luxemburg aims to provide an exhaustive collection of Luxemburg's economic analyses and letters, fostering a deeper understanding of her contributions to Marxist theory. [6]