Submission declined on 21 May 2024 by UtherSRG (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the
talk page of a
relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant
WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Comment: What is needed is signifiant coverage (not just name-checks, see
WP:SIGCOV) in secondary sources that are fully independent of the person, not primary sources where the artist has an affiliation/connection. Also all embedded bare URL external links should be converted to proper sources.
Netherzone (
talk) 07:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
American artist, educator and writer
Margaret Lazzari's artwork has engaged a wide range of subjects in both realistic and abstract styles, including bodies[1][2], beauty[3], gender[4], power[5][6][7][8], censorship[9], illness[10][11][12] and death[13]. She has also produced pure abstractions[14] and nature-based landscape works[15]. Lazzari primarily paints, but has also produced audio-visual installations[16], and public sculptures[17], sometimes partnering with Lauren Evans.[18]
Lazzari has had many solo exhibitions of her work including those at the Billis Williams Gallery[21][22], Los Angeles, at the
Fresno Art Museum[23][24],
Riverside Art Museum[25][26], and
USC Fisher Museum of Art. As half of the Lazzari Evans Public Art design team, she has produced several public commissions, with themes that make evident the persistence of nature in urban environments.
In addition to numerous magazine art reviews, Lazzari has authored or co-authored several popular art textbooks, including: Exploring Art: a Global, Thematic Approach[29]; The Practical Handbook for the Emerging Artist; Drawing; Life Drawing; and Art and Design Fundamentals.[18] In contrast to traditional Art Appreciation texts, Exploring Art pioneered an innovative thematic, rather than chronological, structure and much greater inclusion of non-Western art.
-
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
-
reliable
-
secondary
-
independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.