Submission rejected on 8 May 2024 by
Xoak (
talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Xoak 2 months ago. Last edited by Xoak 2 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 5 July 2023 by
Tutwakhamoe (
talk). This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Tutwakhamoe 12 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 18 October 2022 by
MaxnaCarta (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
MaxnaCarta 20 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 4 October 2022 by
QueerEcofeminist (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
QueerEcofeminist 21 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 10 September 2022 by
Theroadislong (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Theroadislong 22 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 10 September 2022 by
Akevsharma (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Akevsharma 22 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 28 August 2022 by
DGG (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
DGG 22 months ago. | ![]() |
Jacob Distelzweig | |
---|---|
Died | 20 April, 1690 |
Cause of death | Execution by drowning |
Nationality | Spanish |
Known for | Convicted of witchcraft and sodomy in the Spanish Inquisition |
Criminal status |
|
Conviction(s) | Witchcraft |
Criminal penalty | Death |
Jacob Distelzweig, a resident of Alicante, Spain, was executed on April 20, 1690, during the Spanish Inquisition. [1] He died as part of the religious fervor created by the Spanish Inquisition, [2] being executed for the dual accusation of homosexuality and witchcraft. [3] He was born the son of a German immigrant in the region of Alicante, Spain in the 1660s, where he worked as a sheep farmer. Jacob formed a friendship with a man named James (last name unknown) who was the son of a minor noble. James' relationship with Jacob was not approved of by his father. Over time, their relationship grew more intimate and they are believed to have become lovers. When he learned of this, James's father confronted him, and James claimed that he had been bewitched by Jacob and made to commit impure acts with him. [4]
After the initial accusation had been made by James, several other younger men also accused Jacob of bewitching them and causing them to commit sodomy with him. Initially, Jacob claimed to be innocent, but he later confessed to the crimes of sodomy and witchcraft. [4] He is believed to have confessed in order to save the lives of his sexual partners who may have been executed with him for the crime of sodomy. [3] On April 20, 1690 Jacob was killed by being impaled on a stake and thrown into a lake to drown. [1]
The trial of Jacob Distelzweig is significant as it is one of the few surviving records of males being executed for witchcraft during the time period. His death is an example of the persecution of homosexual men during the Spanish Inquisition. During the period of the Spanish Inquisition, there was a push for conformity across the country. This led to outsiders of any kind being subject to suspicion. Sodomites were also believed to bring God's wrath and cause natural disasters. Because of this, the Reyes Catolicos issued an edict exacting the death penalty for men who even attempted to commit sodomy. [5] Jacob Distelzweig's death is an important case of the persecution of homosexuals during the Spanish Inquisition.
The crimes that Jacob Distelzweig was tried for were also of note. He is the only documented person to have been tried for both sodomy and witchcraft. The method of his execution, being impaled and drowned, was unique as well in a time when the usual punishment for sodomy was burning. [5] Additionally, this case was one of the few times when someone accused of witchcraft was able to save others from execution by confessing that they had compelled them to commit the crimes they had. [4] Jacob Distelzweig was also the last man executed for the crime of witchcraft during the Spanish Inquisition. [5]
Category:1690 deaths Category:Year of birth unknown Category:17th-century executions of Spanish people Category:17th-century executions by Spain Category:People of the Spanish Inquisition Category:People executed by the Spanish Inquisition Category:Spanish people executed for witchcraft Category:Witch trials in Spain Category:Spanish Inquisition