If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the
talk page of a
relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant
WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.
Comment: 16 of the 19 footnotes here are to
primary sources that are not support for notability, such as the Academy's own
self-published website, IMDb or YouTube videos -- and while the other three footnotes are to proper
reliable source coverage in real media, that isn't enough in and of itself to override 85 per cent of the footnotes being bad. We're not just looking for verification of facts here, we're looking for reliably sourced evidence that the award has been externally validated as significant by third parties independent of the Academy itself -- namely, media outlets and books -- so just using the Academy's own website and the winners' self-created YouTube videos to verify the accuracy of the facts isn't sufficient. Also, just to clarify, this isn't a "well, I don't care about this" issue -- check out who was the creator and/or primary maintainer of most of our Canadian Screen Award content (spoiler alert: me!) -- but we have to use properly reliable and independent third party sources, such as media coverage and books, to establish notability.
Bearcat (
talk) 22:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Television Awards
The Audience or Fan Choice Award is a special award given at the
Canadian Screen Awards starting at the
2nd Canadian Screen Awards where 2 Fan Choice awards were given to
Zoie Palmer for Fan Choice Award for Favourite Canadian Screen Star and Lost Girl for Fan Choice Award for Favourite Canadian Show (Palmer was a lead in Lost Girl) [1]. The award is chosen based on online voting by fans. The award has been given to both shows and individual actors in the past.
Today, the fan awards are the Cogeco Fund Audience Choice Award and the Shaw Rocket Fund Kids' Choice Award. As of 2022, both awards have been given to TV Shows, not actors.
At the 10th Awards, shows not individual actors received the awards for the first time since fan chosen awards were first given at the 2nd Canadian Screen Awards. The winning Congeco Fund Award show was not one of the originally announced nominees, winning instead through write in.[19]