Submission declined on 25 April 2024 by CNMall41 (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Submission declined on 13 April 2024 by S0091 (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Comment: There seems to be a misunderstanding about the requirements despite the notes left by previous reviewers. We will not keep reviewing drafts just because they are submitted. You need to review the notes and make corrections. You were told that references need to meet
WP:ORGCRIT but instead of pointing out or adding those, you
removed references. I am unsure how to assist at this point.
CNMall41 (
talk) 03:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Previous note requested that you read through links provided in the declined reasoning. However, the
resubmission would show maybe those links were not clear or maybe there is a misunderstanding of the requirement. To make it more simple, references must meet
WP:ORGCRIT to show notability. I cannot find any references in this draft that talk in-depth about the firm. There are some about the founder, some about investments, but nothing that goes into depth. In addition, I want to
WP:AGF but have a hard time believing there is no
WP:COI here. I would request that you read
WP:COI and
WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure if applicable.
CNMall41 (
talk) 21:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Please read through the linked information above. Sources are what those affiliated say so
primary , trivial coverage such as funding announcements or brief mentions.
S0091 (
talk) 21:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Bedrock is an American technology investment firm founded in 2018 by Geoff Lewis.[1][2] As of 2023 Bedrock had approximately US$2 billion in assets under management and investments including
Flock Safety,[3]OpenAI,[4]Rippling[5] and
Vercel[6][7].
History
Bedrock was founded by Geoff Lewis[8] in 2018 with the stated aim to invest in exceptional entrepreneurs through the search for "narrative violations," a term it coined.[9]
Lewis, a former entrepreneur,[10][11][12][13]was previously a partner at Founders Fund[14] and has been a board member at
Lyft,[15] Wish,[16] and
Nubank prior to founding Bedrock.[17]
Bedrock raised its first fund in 2018, with US$127 million in committed capital.[27]
In 2019, Bedrock raised its second fund, with US$350 million in committed capital.[28]
In 2021, Bedrock raised its third fund, with US$350 million in committed capital.[29]
In 2023, Bedrock raised US$400 million in committed capital for its fourth fund, bringing Bedrock's total assets under management to approximately US$2 billion.[30]
-
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
-
reliable
-
secondary
-
strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.