Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,948 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 19 March 2024 by
DoubleGrazing (
talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 19 March 2024 by
DoubleGrazing (
talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by
DoubleGrazing 3 months ago.
|
Submission declined on 19 March 2024 by
DoubleGrazing (
talk). This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by
DoubleGrazing 3 months ago.
|
Appmore (formerly known as Lempinen & Partners) is a Finnish information technology firm founded in 2012. [1] [2] [3] The company employs 19 people, and its headquarters is located in Espoo, Finland. Its CEO is Kai Lempinen. Appmores slogan is Ignite Your Workflows With The Application Platform. [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
Appmore provides and manages business applications like IAM, ITSM, GRC, CSM, and SecOps using ServiceNow and Atlassian technologies. [9] [10] Appmore worked together with SSH to create a platform that combines IAM and PAM. [11] [12]
Apotti tendered a 1.5 million ServiceNow deal in 2020, and Appmore won the tender. [13] The contract was signed in 2021. [14] Appmore implemented Identity and Access management for Apotti, the world’s first social and healthcare information system in 2021. [15] [16] In the same year the Finnish Tax Administration completed its tender for IT project manager and specialist services. This framework agreement, estimated to be worth approximately 50 million euros over the contract period, spans six years. Appmore participated in the tender and won. [17] Other public customers include Elisa, Hkscan, Normet, Tietoevry, Ratepay, and KORE Wireless. [18] The company's official sales and services partners are Fujitsu, Intragen, KPMG, and Guidevision. Technology partners include ServiceNow, Atlassian, SAP, Microsoft, and SSH. [19] [20]
In 2024 Appmore was selected to participate in the SUPERFINNS 2024 program for fast-growing Finnish companies hosted by Kasvu Open and Nordea. [21] [22]
-
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
-
reliable
-
secondary
-
strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.