Submission declined on 27 March 2024 by
DrowssapSMM (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 27 March 2024 by
I'm tla (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by
I'm tla 4 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 27 March 2024 by
Kline (
talk). This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by
Kline 4 months ago. | ![]() |
![]() | |
Editor | Alexandre Kurek, Ayla Pui-yi Leung, Bastian Bentrup, Lukas Meyer, Loïc Sutter, Mark Bessoudo |
---|---|
Categories | Contemporary Photography |
Publisher | Alexandre Kurek |
Founded | 2018 |
Based in | Berlin, Germany |
Language | English |
Website |
allcitiesarebeautiful |
allcitiesarebeautiful.com is a platform focused on contemporary documentary photography and reflective writing, with a dedication to examining the changes occurring in urban environments due to industrialization, suburbanization, and commercialization. Established in 2018, the platform primarily serves as a directory of photographers, writers, and international publishers, functioning as a hub for accessing their works. [1]
The platform features a mix of emerging photographers and established artists, united by their shared interest in cities, the built environment, and its human dimensions. The photography style emphasized on the platform is characterized by a direct approach that highlights the form, function, and context of urban subjects. [1]
Inspired by the ethos of The New Topographic Movement, the platform's aesthetic challenges conventional perceptions of urbanization, exploring the interplay between beauty and banality in the built environment. Through the perspectives of the photographers showcased on the platform, audiences are provided with insights into the multifaceted nature of urban environments, encouraging a reconsideration of established narratives and viewpoints. [2]
Category:Community websites Category:Photography Category:Photography websites