From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DePierre v. United States
Argued February 28, 2011
Decided June 9, 2011
Full case nameFrantz DePierre, Petitioner v. United States
Docket no. 09-1533
Citations564 U.S. 70 ( more)
131 S. Ct. 2225; 180 L. Ed. 2d 114
Argument Oral argument
Case history
PriorConviction affirmed, 599 F.3d 25 ( 1st Cir. 2010); cert. granted, 562 U.S. ___ (2010).
Holding
The term "cocaine base" in 21 U.S.C.  § 841(b)(1) refers to cocaine in its chemically basic form.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajoritySotomayor, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Kagan; Scalia (except Part III–A)
ConcurrenceScalia (in part)
Laws applied
21 U.S.C.  § 841(b)(1)

DePierre v. United States, 564 U.S. 70 (2011), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the use of the term "cocaine base" in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) [1] refers to cocaine in its chemically basic form. [2] The decision of the Court was unanimous, except with respect to Part III–A.

Background

A federal court found Frantz DePierre guilty of distributing cocaine in April 2008. Additionally, DePierre was found guilty of distributing more than 50 grams of "cocaine base, which carries a 10-year minimum sentence." Following this conviction, DePierre was sentenced to 10 years in a federal prison followed by 5 years of supervised release. Two years later, the US Court of Appeals upheld the sentencing,

Question Before the Court

Does the term "cocaine base" cover a broad spectrum of cocaine defined chemically as a base, or is the term specifically limited to the use and distribution of "crack" cocaine? [3]

Decision of the Court

In a unanimous decision, Justice Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the Court defining cocaine base as not just crack cocaine, but any substance that contains "cocaine in its chemically basic form." [4]

Concurring Opinion

Justice Scalia wrote a brief, humorous concurring opinion arguing that the Court's look into legislative history is unneeded and potentially harmful.

See also

References

  1. ^ 21 U.S.C.  § 841(b)(1).
  2. ^ DePierre v. United States Opinion p. 1 "This case requires us to decide whether the term "cocaine base" as used in [21 U.S.C. §841(b)(1)] refers generally to cocaine in its chemically basic form or exclusively to what is colloquially known as "crack cocaine." We conclude that "cocaine base" means the former."
  3. ^ "DePierre v. United States". Oyez: Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved November 14, 2013.
  4. ^ "DePierre v. United States". Justia: The US Supreme Court Center. Retrieved November 14, 2013.