This category is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This category is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
it redirects to another place that had the name outside of Nebraska. Marine Corps Air Station Miramar. Don't have the texts in front of me to verify along with Fort Kearny there was a Camp Kearney in Nebraska. If so how can it be set up that it doesn't redirect to a place outside of nebraska when both use the name? a disambiguation of some sort? --
Xiahou00:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)reply
I recognize that not all US forts were/are military facilities. I suppose an alternative is to place the military forts in both "Forts in state" and "Military facilities in state." --
Scott Alter17:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Yep, that sounds like a feasible solution. I wonder if it is important to relate the two categories somehow, or if listing them under "Buildings and structures in state" is close enough? The only option I could think would be to allow "Forts in state" to be a general category, with "Military forts in state" listed as a subcat? I'm not sure. • Freechild'sup?18:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)reply
I thought it was important to relate the categories, which is why I added forts to military facilities. Creating a military forts as a sub category is a good idea. Then, it would be in both forts and military facilities. The only potential problem is that the new category would potentially be very small. --
Scott Alter18:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)reply