Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via
proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as
maintenance deletions (G6) or
stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in
deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "
userfied", i.e., restored as a
draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed
here).
This means that content deleted after discussion – through
deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through
deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.
Do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria
F7,
F9,
F11,
U5,
A7,
A9,
A11,
G3,
G4,
G10,
G11 or
G12 be undeleted here.
@
Thriley:Done – as a draft that was deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the
draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the
article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.
UtherSRG(talk)19:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Samiasara:Not done The entire text of the draft as deleted was:
Hadeeth Foundation Bangladesh is an Islamic research center with publishing house. It is eslablished by Muhammad Asadullah Al-Ghalib.<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Daily Star Web Edition Vol. 5 Num 265 |url=https://archive.thedailystar.net/2005/02/24/d5022401011.htm |access-date=2023-03-08 |website=archive.thedailystar.net}}</ref>
Soft deleted at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calibretto 13. Calibretto meets Notability section 1 criterion, with multiple published album reviews in newspapers, print magazines, and punk zines.
They also meet criterion section 5, with two full length albums and 1 EP released on Tooth and Nail Records (A notable independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable, and a significant impact within a specific music genre. (alternative Christian punk and hardcore scene))
The band's music also has notable cultural impact as it was featured in multiple published works including the Stephen Baldwin produced documentary "Livin It" and the WB tv show "What's New, Scooby Doo?". The band had a significant impact on the late 90s/early 2000s Christian punk scene, and this influence is referenced in John Paul Klugh's master's thesis titled : "A Home for the Outcasts: An Analysis of Christian Rock as an Expression of Postmodern Christianity" —
Theo1858 (
talk)
20:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Sylvan1971:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I note that this has also been tagged as COI, which must also be addressed before this can be moved to mainspace.
BD2412T21:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)reply
And now, the recreated talk page has already been moved to its proper location. After undeleting the earlier edits,
Special:MergeHistory should then be used to move them back to their proper location (if possible).
GTrang (
talk)
00:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Done – as a draft that was deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the
draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the
article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. @
KingArti:Graeme Bartlett (
talk)
06:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Why was the Miss Washington USA page deleted? They ended a 19-year placement drought at the most recent edition of Miss USA and wanted to document that. I have been frequently editing/updating citations to Miss USA, Miss Teen USA, and the respective state titleholder Wikipedia pages throughout the year to make sure everything is up to date since the pageant has new directors at the state and national level.
Hi, I'm Cnvery, and I would like to request the undeletion of this
draft deleted under
CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you.
Cnvery (
talk)
02:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Done – as a
draft or
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing. @
Cnvery:Graeme Bartlett (
talk)
06:58, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Done – as a draft that was deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the
draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the
article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. @
Gashlycrumm:Graeme Bartlett (
talk)
07:38, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Raywalk:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
UtherSRG(talk)14:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi, this is Usercinque and I would like to request the deletion of this
Drafts deleted under
CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can edit it. Unfortunately, for very serious health reasons , I have not been able to continue. Could you please help me? Thank you very much.
Usercinque (
talk)
14:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Usercinque:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
BD2412T15:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
EdgarBrown:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
BD2412T15:33, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Bernesant24: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission.
Draft space is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article
mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise.
UtherSRG(talk)18:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
I just received a book from my parish priest with notes from a capuchin frair that I can incorporate and finalise the page. As it's summer recess from university were I was rly busy with research, assignments and exams I had to shelf this project. Pls Allow me to finalise it next month after I conclude reading and examining the material I found.
@
Bernesant24:Done – as a draft that was deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the
draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the
article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.
UtherSRG(talk)19:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Thriley:Done – as a draft that was deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the
draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the
article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.
UtherSRG(talk)19:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Starklinson:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
BD2412T21:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
AudaciousT:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
07:54, 28 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Mysteriolane:Done – as an
Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!.
Less Unless (
talk)
10:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Mysteriolane:Done – as an
Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!.
Less Unless (
talk)
10:07, 28 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Mysteriolane:Done – as an
Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!.
Less Unless (
talk)
10:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi, I'm Gahsem, and I would like to request the undeletion of this
draft deleted under
CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you.
Gahsem (
talk)
12:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Gahsem:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
UtherSRG(talk)16:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Urmelbeauftragter:Done – as a
draft or
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.
BD2412T18:29, 28 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Pncke:Done – as a
draft or
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.
BD2412T18:30, 28 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
TaoLar2020:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
UtherSRG(talk)17:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Amit Khuva:Not done – this page was deleted as a
blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a
vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a
notable topic, e.g., multiple
reliable,
secondary, published sources that are entirely
independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a
neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial.
Hi, I'm sathish, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! —
SKumar58 (
talk)
13:50, 29 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
UtherSRG(talk)17:37, 29 July 2024 (UTC)reply
The article was deleted at the original author's request. However, the content was valuable and informative to the Wikipedia community. I am willing to contribute to the article's maintenance and ensure it adheres to Wikipedia's guidelines. —
iVickyChoudhary (
talk)
19:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Mozucat:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
UtherSRG(talk)12:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Thriley:Done – as a draft that was deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the
draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the
article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.
UtherSRG(talk)12:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Notsomelodramatic:Done – as a draft that was deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the
draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the
article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.
UtherSRG(talk)12:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Adarshngo:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
UtherSRG(talk)12:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
We would like to request permission to rewrite the Adani Sportline page to ensure that the content is purely informational and adheres to Wikipedia's standards of neutrality. Our goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of what the Adani Sportline organization is, without any promotional language. We will make every effort to maintain a neutral tone throughout the content. —
Up82 (
talk)
07:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Up82:Not done – this page was deleted as a
blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a
vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a
notable topic, e.g., multiple
reliable,
secondary, published sources that are entirely
independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a
neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial.
UtherSRG(talk)12:09, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Noted, Can we try and rewrite the article in a neutral point of view. Would you please give us the opportunity to rewrite it again? Looking forward to your reply. Thanks.
Up82 (
talk)
12:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
However, as this would be eligible for deletion immediately upon its restoration, I have chosen to instead draftify it as
Draft:Kütahya Porselen. This will provide you the time and space to address the issue(s) raised in the deletion discussion. When you have done so, please do not move this into main article space yourself, but instead submit it for further review. -
UtherSRG(talk)12:10, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Bxep2321:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
BD2412T18:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Draft:The National Longitudinal Study of the Class of 1972
@
Carolinasouth:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
BD2412T18:43, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Crouch, Swale:Done – as a
draft or
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.
BD2412T18:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Change the licensing to author only providing usage to non-commercial and education purposes only. Putting the CC0 was a mistake on my end. —
Fluddsskark (
talk)
07:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Not done The non-commercial/education-purpose-only restrictions make the image "non-free" and therefore it would need a detailed
WP:NFC rationale to explain how you would use it in a way that meets
WP:NFCC. As an image of
Yan Zhu, a living person, it's essentially impossible to satisfy those restrictions, and even more-so since there is a free image already available.
DMacks (
talk)
18:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
However, as this would be eligible for deletion immediately upon its restoration, I have chosen to instead draftify it as
Draft:White Crane Films. This will provide you the time and space to address the issue(s) raised in the deletion discussion. When you have done so, please do not move this into main article space yourself, but instead submit it for further review. -
UtherSRG(talk)11:39, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
WYMORE2010:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
UtherSRG(talk)11:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Done – as an
Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!.
UtherSRG(talk)14:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
MultiformeIngegno:Done – as an
Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!.
UtherSRG(talk)17:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Good morning and/or afternoon, I am FireBrigadeFanaticNO1, and I would like to request the undeletion of
draft which was deleted under
CSD G13. Please could the page be restored? I had a lot of info waiting to be edited onto the page but I hadn't the chance to sort it due to issues IRL, yet, I now have a chance to.
@
Modelingai:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
UtherSRG(talk)18:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
FloridaArmy:Done – as a draft that was deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the
draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the
article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.
UtherSRG(talk)18:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
TakuyaMurata:Done This was moved to userspace and redirected from there before also being deleted there. I have restored the last non-redirect version of the content that was moved to userspace to this draft title.
BD2412T18:57, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
So, I don’t know what this draft is about and because the deletion is by G13, it’s not clear if the draft is still needed or not or if it contains some content that needed to be merged into mainspace. —
Taku (
talk)
19:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
TakuyaMurata:Done – as a
draft or
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.
BD2412T19:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
Draft:Measurement-Based Care in Mental Health Services
Done – as a
draft or
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. They are not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion, prior to another six months elapsing.
BD2412T19:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
My guess is that this is unlikely to be notable for a standalone article but the draft may still contain materials that need to be merged into mainspace. —
Taku (
talk)
19:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
TakuyaMurata:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
BD2412T19:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
According to my Google research, this is unlikely to be notable but may still need to be merged into mainspace (emphasis on may, I just don’t know). —
Taku (
talk)
19:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply
@
TakuyaMurata:Done – as an
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
BD2412T19:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)reply